Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have definetly considered the single option, as well as I understand the benefits of it. Its just not a route I wish to go. Thanks for the info however!

I dont really care about high or low mount as I well be getting a custom manifold anyway. I do want to keep an internal wastegate however.

After doing research all of the turbos I had mentioned above would allow me to do this. However after looking at things, I have narrowed it down to either the GT-RS or the 2560 -10 for me. It appears they are damn near identical turbos, so it just comes down to which one I suppose.

-Sayajin

Okay. So I have decided. After doing a good bit of research on my goals and purposes for my car, I have narrowed it down to 3 choices.

One is the HKS GT-RS turbos.

The other two are equivalent versions of the GT-RS, just made by Garrett.

The 2560 -10 that we were discussing

The GT2871R -15 w/ .64 Housing AR (same housing size as GT-RS)

The above two turbos are exactly the same with the expection of the housing .86AR vs the .64 AR. All of the other specs are the same.

How much of a difference in lag vs power will the two housings have? I will gladly give a little power up for a lot faster spoolup.

Comments?

-Sayajin

My vote is twin GT2871RS with the 0.60 compressor and 0.64 turbine. They each flow enough air for 400 bhp using 1.5 bar at 74% efficiency. You should be looking at 1 bar boost by 4,000 rpm, which leaves plenty of room for rpm changes on gearchanges etc.

The 1 bar at 4,00 rpm is based on 3 litre capacity with 9 to 1 compression ratio and 264 degree cams with around 9.5 mm lift and some decent porting on an RB26 cylinder head.

:( cheers ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...