Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi. Ive just taken off a r32 actuator on my r33 turbo and replaced it with a stock r33 actuator.

Now theres a loud ticking noise coming from the rear turbo housing. It looks like the wastegate flap is too close to the rear housing.

Can anyone tell me why this has happened?

What was done to fit the r32 item? or was it a straight swap?

Im assuming my turbo wont be liking this too much...

Thanks :wacko::D

Edit: also the car is really slugish now. And doesnt come on boost til about 3000rpm!!!

Edited by 33SOM
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/157987-r32-actuator-on-r33-turbo/
Share on other sites

I checked both actuators compared to each other next to each other. They were identical in physical dimensions (otherwise I wouldn't have been able to use it).

If you're running a boost controller, you'll have to retune the gain etc. Because it was tuned for the 32 actuator.

If you try just running the actuator to vac without any boost controller, it'll be the same boost build.

I've had many 32 actuators before, and they always boost the same as the r33 ones

scraping noise is very very odd.

All the actuator does, is open and close the flap. When the actuator isn't 'actuating' the flap is closed tight. There isn't any sideways movement possible really.

It's physically impossible for it to touch your turbo wheel.

When it's open, it's not anywhere near the turbo wheel.

Have a look inside the dump, like take it off, and see if the wheel is contacting the housing. The turbo might actually have become worn?

I think it may have something to with the tension the wastegate actuator imposes on the wastegate.

To little tension and the wastegate rattles around like you mentioned and this also means the wastegate is partially open which explains the delay in boost.

It really makes no sense how it happened when you swaped actuators which are phycially the same dimmensions though.

I had a similar problem when I swapped turbo's. The core of the new turbo was shorter than old one, which made the actuator rod too long. My solution was to weld in a cable tensioner, which works in the same way as the HKS adjustable actuators.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...