Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive recently had trouble with PAR boxes in a customers R33 GTR. Its making 420Kw and is having huge problems with 3rd.

Looking at the gear they start as a 2 peice gear, the actual gear itself then the syncro dog teeth are on a separate ring thats welded to the gear, In this particular case the welds are constantly breaking around the gear.

PAR don't want to know about the problem as you would expect.

They seem to beleive oh the box was built a few years ago and its normal for them to fail after a while.

My x misson box has been taking the same ammount of grunt for a while and Ive had no problems at all. Id expect the PAR box to be more than capable as well.

LoL, and thats JUST a fun track car! Hahaha. Thats gold hey.

Yeah, OK, so I tend to get a bit carried away with these things :( I dress like a tramp, don't have holidays, and do 99% of my own work, it's a kinda drug I guess :)

I must say I didn't realise PPG did a sequential kit. Will this fit the R33 GTS-t casing, or is it for the Getrag casing? Thanks for all your feedback SK. The stock box is slowing me down a lot. The ratios are all to pot, second is too low, I never use first save for starting off, and the change into fifth is slow, and 3 rd and 5th synchros wear out for fun. I now NEED a decent gearbox in it, a proper weld in cage to get some tortional rigidity, and some more power, which should be addressed by an all steel RB26 lump which I have nearly completed. Once the cage is in I'll be a lot happier to fit some nice carbon doors i got vac moulded here in the UK at 2.8 kilos each, with full stock pattern internal shells. I feel too vulnerable without the stock steel doors with impact bars and no cage, particularly after stuffing it sideways into the barriers at Oulton Park last year...

We use Hollinger sequentials in the Hollinger case with the standard transfer case (4wd) or without (2wd) wherever the regs allow, I have never seen a PPG sequential.

You need an RB30, the standard gearbox ratios are fine with their power spread.

At the worst (2nd to 3rd & 4th to 5th) we logged around 2/10ths of second faster up shift with the dog box over the synchro box. At 30 odd gear changes per lap, it adds up to around 1/2 second per lap faster using the dog box, or the length of the straight in a 20 minute race.

We have to use standard panels, no lightweight stuff allowed.

A nice cage certainly makes you feel safer, plus it adds a bucket load of rigidity. We can come down ~25% in the spring rates once the cages go in.

:( cheers :)

  • 2 weeks later...

Some pics of our synchro SR20 PPG, we opted for the billet selectors aswell as these are half the reason these boxes wont shift gears at high rpm.

post-34927-1175579356.jpg

post-34927-1175579374.jpg

post-34927-1175579393.jpg

Edited by URAS
In the first pic, is the shaft that is at the front of the pic one piece?

Nah it has to be removable for assy, but this is where the OSGIKEN gearsets were breaking (not sure where the PAR ones keep breaking). The OSGIKEN used the factory key way setup whereas the PPG uses a better spline setup (look under bearing you can just see it)

  • 2 weeks later...

for the ppg gearset in a rb25 5speed. With the 26t spline uprated input shaft you need to run the std size bearing(23mm i think) and shim it up. We tried to run the bigger bearing (26mm) but it pushes the input shaft 3mm too far into the box.

Thats what we have found out that was a slight issue with the gearset in the 25 box.

Typically the PAR (pressision and robotics engineering) boxes have a 2 peice gear. The gear itself is tough however the dog teeth section is made separatly and then fusion welded to the gear. Typically the ones ive seen have broken the welds and the syncro dogs simply spin on the gear.

The only good part about the PAR gear set is that the lay shaft (lower Gears) are actually modualar and can be removed from the shaft so it saves alot of time come repair and maintanance as you dont have to strip the whole box from the sandwhich plate to access individual gears and syncros.

  • 3 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...