Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've noticed this for a while now, when putting the power down around a corner, the car would rev a touch higher and would jerk around. I am not breaking traction, nor am I going sideways.

It almost feels like the clutch is slipping, but I've had that replaced about 1000km's ago with a ceramic plate jobbie, that fixed up old mr slippery-launch!

Now when driving, changing lanes while putting the power down, the car flicks-back into the other lane quickly, almost like I'm recovering from traction loss.... But i'm not.

I put the car up on jacks (the entire rear-end) and noticed how the wheels spinned when i turned them manually.

I can turn the wheels in any direction and the other wheel will follow suit SLOWER. I can also hold back one wheel while I turn the other. The drive shaft is still turning when I hold one wheel back.

It is obviously a touch stiffer when I hold one wheel back, but I can still turn it. I thought an LSD was supposed to force each wheel to turn the same etc ? and you can't hold it back ? (can you?)

I've recently replaced diff oil with Castrol LSX90 (the best stuff for LSDs apparently)

What is happening ?

What usually wears out on a diff to make this happen ?

How can it be fixed ? Can I just take it to a Differential specialist and tell him to weld it locked ?

Cheers Guys,

-Kym.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15988-help-diff-problem/
Share on other sites

mine does the same, im not to sure what it is... just how it feels like your flicking the arse end out but u haven't broken traction in the first place. I have a feeling that it was something to do with the 4 wheel steer. Thats a guess, but thats what I was pointing towards

Sumo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15988-help-diff-problem/#findComment-327751
Share on other sites

hah kym i have the same problem i think

well mine - the car kinda 'wanders' when i change lanes

think of it as high winds blowing the car and you can feel it slightly swerving in a way

sorry im not good at explaining

however, i wanna get rid of HICAS as problem is definately caused by it (HICAS warning light comes on regularly)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15988-help-diff-problem/#findComment-331203
Share on other sites

Guest Boxhead

from what i know, if your doing one wheel burnouts, its a open diff, which either means thats what it is in your car, which is un likely, or your lsd is going bye bye, myn gives bad feedback, makes horrible clicking noises, and chooses when it wants to do 2 wheel burn outs, ive been told it is on its way out, and some say its the way it is.. ohwell.. if anyone knows were to source cheap GOOD diffs, sing out

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15988-help-diff-problem/#findComment-331225
Share on other sites

afaik the R33 GTST has a viscous LSD , not a mechanical as per a GTR.

Viscous relies on silicon gel to heat up caused by a different turning rate in the axles.

If the diff is a bit old , this may take time to react if it does at all.

The waving or lane changing is more related to w/alignment , tyre pressures , shot tyres or slack bushings.

What you have to realise is the hicas works in the same direction as the front wheels above 60kmh ( or so ) and only move by 1 or 2 deg anyway.

Cheers

Ken

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15988-help-diff-problem/#findComment-331232
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...