Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by jethead98

Can anyone provide me with the Part Number of the belt and waterpump needed on the rb25det motor as fitted to a R33 Gts-t please...once the motor is in pieces l cant go anywhere during the day to get bits.......:burnout:

jethead,,,,no probs:-Straight out of Nissan's Fast Moving Parts Book

Timing Belt 13028-20P25 RB25DET 8/93-2/98

" " 13028-20P25 RB26DETT 1/95 onwards

" " 13028-5L327 RB25DET 2/98 onwards

Only reason I also added the GTR part number is it's the same as most GTS-T's.

Water Pump 21010-21U25 All RB25DET's.

Must be tons of after-market brands,,,,same as VL's.....

Neil.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1599-timing-belt/page/2/#findComment-45607
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Originally posted by 400HP

thanks guys

I guess i need not worry then.

In any case when this does get done how much time/cost is it?

Hey...I don't know wot car u drive but if its an import...be a lil more careful..only bcos of the winding back the odometer factor..!!

my odometer reads around 80 000...and wen i got my car serviced at HMS...around 70 000kms...Mark thought that my timing belt was around 20 000 kms overdue..!! which suggests my cars real odometer reading should be around 130000 atm..!!

Yeah and I got my waterpump replaced at the same time..!

just in case others are the same..!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1599-timing-belt/page/2/#findComment-77589
Share on other sites

Hey...I don't know wot car u drive but if its an import...be a lil more careful..only bcos of the winding back the odometer factor..!!

Yep I'm aware of this factor. So you did end up getting it replaced then? how much did it cost and how long did it take?

It's Yang by the way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1599-timing-belt/page/2/#findComment-77590
Share on other sites

Hey Yang...this is actually Yeekei...I'm frens with leanne..my brother doesnt use these forums..!! so yeah btw..if neone sees my car...but gets ignored or snobbed...and the driver is wearing glasses then its my brother..haha!!

oh btw..congratulations on ur graduation!!

umm..yeah I replaced it..I cant remember how much exactly..the whole service cost around 1000...! that was normal 10000km service...dyno...boss kit...and waterpump and timing belt...!!

so i think both timing belt and waterpump replacements were 500-600 dollars!

ummm...shud take a day...except mine took 2...cos Nissan Hornsby fuct up and didnt send the water pump over..!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1599-timing-belt/page/2/#findComment-77623
Share on other sites

oh btw..congratulations on ur graduation

Cheers... thanks for that.

whole service cost around 1000...! that was normal 10000km service...dyno...boss kit...and waterpump and timing belt...!!

Man thats actually quite cheap. HMS always do a good job at a very reasonable price. Consider yourself lucky cos my friend had his FTO done there for a major service just like yuors without the waterpump and it came out to be 2 days and the same price...

Anyway will keep it in mind when i need the belt changed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1599-timing-belt/page/2/#findComment-77706
Share on other sites

One other thing to watch is the two idler rollers on the cambelt. If you are on your second or third timing belt, it may be time to replace the belt tensioner and idler bearings as well.

If one of these fails, the belt will break or come off, and you will then be in real trouble.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1599-timing-belt/page/2/#findComment-77799
Share on other sites

i was considering changeing the timing belt aswell as all three fanbelts on my R32 GTST but after reading this fourm ive decided to let the pros do it. ive been quoted about $560.00 from mark at hills motorsport. to change the timing belt fanbelts water pump. does this sound reasonable to youz??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/1599-timing-belt/page/2/#findComment-79381
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...