Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Just wondering whether a secondhand T3 VL turbo for $500 is worth the upgrade on my R33 GTST Series 2? As its supposed to bolt straight on, since R33's have T3 flanges but T28 turbos...

Anyone know any stats on these turbos? Is it a worthwhile mod to get more hp than stock turbo?

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16034-t3-vl-turbo-for-r33-gts-t/
Share on other sites

I would think the RB25 Turbo would be a better bet over a vg30 turbo due to the newer tech and better efficiency.

?!?

I noticed with the VG30BB it wasn't really that much better but around 1000rpm laggier compared to the standard RB20DET Terd. Overall it was slower on the road and still dropped boost.

Apparently the R33 & R34 turbo's don't drop boost.

Thats roughly the same as a RB25DET Turbo though.

Even if it were to make 300kw the RB25DET will spool earlier and make around the same power.

It may end up being slower with a RB30ET Turbo compared to the RB25DET turbo making similiar power due to the vl turbo being laggier.

im not too sure about 300rwkw with a stndrd t3.

i have around 215rwkw , still using the t3 though it has been hifloe'd , not using t4 internals but.

i think with tuning capabilities of a skyline compared to the vl , the t3 would go nicely on it.

matched with correct exhaust and cooler blah blah blah.

with a hiflo t3 ur garaunteed to make more power.

they are oil and water cooler , steel wheels but not bb.

How are they lag wise?

A standard RB25DET Turbo will make 210rwkw on a RB25DET.

I wouldn't really bother with the VL as it will probably lag a little more than the standard unit and on the street it will be slower.

OVL-747 origionally 382 GZV - 4 Door R33 said 300kw which is at the flywheel then slip sliped in the rwkw which is around 400kw at the flywheel.

T3 will get you around the 200-220 rwkw mark in a hi-flowed form. And they are NOT ceramic stock.

They run out of efficiency though thats why people hi-flow them and it works realy well.

anymore than that and that's where you get the much loved t3/4 combo's and they produce some serious power.

good for 11-10 sec passes.

There are a million different combo's with housings/wheels that people have played with.

lag wise tough... i've got a t04E and i get FULL boost at 4500 but it makes boost from 3500 (yes mega lag) but that's totally unmodified. Also to mention i got the 'R' extractors

It would suit a 3ltr perfect but i'm gonna play with bits eventually to get it to around 4000-4200.

depending on price... And if you exisiting one is a little tired and you get a blown T3 and the Hi-flow it (which basically makes it liek new)

You live in Altona... so there will be LOTS of blown/new ones and very cheap LOL

Dunno how they go holding boost till 7000rpm though as VL's don't rev that high... but then the produce more exhaust... ?!?!?!

But definately get a good boost controller. I had a Calais Trubo a while back. It had a t3 hi-flo. Went like the stink :)

It kept spiking all the time thoguh as it just had a bleed valve so it was all over the place and boost didn't hold properly.

With a good one there would be nice results.

But maybe hi-flo your exisiting one ?

I seeing a few do that now... few threads about it now too lately.

Basically BATMBL the T3 from a VL isn't an upgrade.

Make 200+rwkw on the standard turbo first then upgrade to a larger turbo after then. The T3 from a VL is older technology hence it wont be as efficient at your desired boost levels and it will make boost later.

For example:

The VG30BB Turbo, it has a larger exhaust housing however it has a smaller compressor than the RB25DET Turbo. It also drops boost where as the RB25DET Item doesn't.

It isn't an upgrade.. Save your money and spend the $500 towards engine management.

joel - lag wise it is very good , well on my car at least.

putting it on a smaller capacity engine then yeah id say itd increase lag a bit.

what size ex housings are on the 25det?

as you said save his cash and put it towards engine management , thatll get him more hp too , so either way he is a winner

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...