Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Quick question, I'm goin to get some Yokohama Advan v103's fitted this weekend, and am currently running 17 x 9 te37's, jsut wondering what would be the best width to go for 245 or 255, and what differences the extra 10 mil will make in handling / ride quality.

Any help will be appreciated.

Cheers,

Dave.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/160395-tyre-width-question/
Share on other sites

With 245/40R17, your speedo will read 0.65% faster. 627.8mm rolling diameter

With 255/40R17, your speedo will read 0.62% faster. 635.8mm rolling diameter

Stock 205/55R16 is 631.9mm rolling diameter. Bees dick in it

Different rolling diameters cause speedos to be out by a percentage not a static amount

You've got the wider rim, may aswell use it and get the wider rubber if they're the same price. If it was me, I'd get which ever is cheaper though :happy:

Edited by salad
  salad said:
With 245/40R17, your speedo will read 0.65% faster. 627.8mm rolling diameter

With 255/40R17, your speedo will read 0.62% faster. 635.8mm rolling diameter

Stock 205/55R16 is 631.9mm rolling diameter. Bees dick in it

Different rolling diameters cause speedos to be out by a percentage not a static amount

You've got the wider rim, may aswell use it and get the wider rubber if they're the same price. If it was me, I'd get which ever is cheaper though :happy:

i think standard GTR tyre size is 225.

personally I think on a 9inch rim on a GTR go the 245. but there is not much in it. and some brands 245 will have as much tread with as another brands 255. if there is much of a price difference just get the 245. if there is not much difference get the 255.

  Beer Baron said:
i think standard GTR tyre size is 225.

personally I think on a 9inch rim on a GTR go the 245. but there is not much in it. and some brands 245 will have as much tread with as another brands 255. if there is much of a price difference just get the 245. if there is not much difference get the 255.

Oh whoops didn't realise that he had a GTR. Anyway, 225/50R16 is 0.5mm smaller than 205/55R16, or 0.08% so all calculations hold

Lucky me :D

Edited by salad

thanks for hte replies guys, but i guess what im trying to ask is what kind of influence on ride / handling will different sized rubber stretched over the rim produce?

for example will wider tyres cause the car to tramline more, or will they provide more grip? what are the advantages/disadvantages of going the wider or the narrower tyre on the rim?

Cheers,

Dave

Get 255's.....they are perfect for a 9" rim. If you use 245's the rim protector bead around the tyre does not stick out past the rim like it's suppose to.

The price difference between the two is minimal because 255's are commonly used now. I went 265 last time and the price jump was HUGE because 265 is not a common size. I will go back to 255 next time because there is buggerall difference for a road car and I can't justify the large price hike for 265's

mmmm, i see most of you guys running 40 profiles. I have 17x9's with 45 profiles all round as i thought this was the norm?

I have power fc and my speedo doesn't seem to be out too much? i do run 235's if that makes a difference and its a gtst!

Edited by mr_rbman

The profile or aspect ratio is a ratio of the tyre width. So a skinnier tyre with a higher aspect ratio can have a similar diameter to a wider tyre with smaller aspect ratio.

Eg. 205/55R16 is almost identical to 225/50R16 in rolling diameter.

225/45R17 is almost identical to 255/40R17

etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...