Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bump

hey fellaz, ye well before i decided to go nutso on the engine i was already running the power fc with gt2530's. wen i wanted to go huge turbos i had 2 get rid of the afm's so the biggest and best is of course the motec and the motec only runs the engine side of things in my case becuase to run everything u need to get a full loom made and thats another few thousand bucks so normally u let the standard computer run that and then run the motec on top but i already had the power fc so ye. but to make it last and make it safer on the tuning side of things, ye u guys are right same concept as willall i can sell it and make some money but id rather be safe and ye i always chek the knocks, its a helpful also with other things because i run separte water temp and air temp sensors for the motec so the power fc is still reading the water temp and air temp, so ye the power fc does nothing for tuning its just there so i can monitor the way my engine is running. haha and that chik in the pic HAS 2 FULL ARMS, she was moving and i took that pic with a povvo camera so i ye jst looks like her arms not there.

Bud. where did you get your body parts and wing? What brands are they?

Cheers

J.

oh. are you looking for a cheaper import to trade down to? I have a modified R32 gtst available?(missus car)

  • 2 weeks later...

Good luck with the sale, i think it will be hard to sell this car at $48k, normally 32's would have a time slip or a dyno graph to prove the claims, but yeah good luck.

What rods are in it? I dont know how an N1 crank could take 1000hp+ seeing as there is no difference between an N1 crank and a normal crank....

Think you might wanna keep the car, there are cars being sold direct from Jap which have more fruit and power with sequential boxes etc for less.

www.draganddrift.com

Edited by GT51R

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...