Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I reckon all boxer engines sound similar. Porsches sound more like VW's than WRX's do though.

I'm not sure why the sounds are different, but with a boxer 4 and a v-twin (motorcycle) you get more of a pulse because each half of the engine fires at once. I don't know how that applies to boxer 6 engines because I would have thought the extra set of pistons would interrupt the pulse wave of the other 2.

That also doesn't really explain V8's, which have even more cylinders to interfere with the "pulse" sound, and yet they still sound very "pulsy".

Also, 180 degree parallel twin engines (motorcycles again) sound fairly "smooth" like an inline 4, but a 270 degree parallel twin sounds like a v-twin which also has a 270 degree firing pattern.

thatz coz its a box, and boxes make weird noises?? :confused:

tiny little engine it is, but impressive for little engine, the boxster 2L engine it is..

its like so mini compared to a boxes..to me it doesn't make heaps of power compared to the sky, but in that space it is efficient for power compared to the outside universe.

Subaru (WRX, Forester, Liberty) and VW (Beetle, Kombi, Type 3) engines are the same basic layout and like two40 says have a different firing order to an inline 4. This is why they sound similar if you listen to exhaust noise and not mechanical noise. The VW is extra noisy because it's air cooled and does not benefit from the noise reducing properties of a liquid cooled engine.

Porsche went to a great deal of trouble on the 996 engine (1st production water cooled boxer 6 for them) to retain the "air cooled" sound.

I follow all that, they have a different firing order etc., but they still fire one cylinder per 180 degrees (four cyl four stroke) of crankshaft revolution, just like an inline four, but they sound distinctly different. I cant figure out why, and I haven't heard a satisfactory explanation. For instance, if you changed the camshafts on an inline four to give a different firing order the car (or bike) would sound the same. In fact I believe early Kawasakis had different firing order (1,4,2,3) from Honda (1,4,3,2) but sounded pretty much the same. If it's doing 1000 rpm then it's firing 1000 times a minute at 1/1000 minute intervals regardless of its firing order or configuration. So why does it sound different?

Originally posted by two40

I've never heard a WRX that sounds like a VW.  

VW's sound the way they do because they have a metal chain.

WRX's sound the way they do because like you said, it's a flat four. Crap layout if you ask me. I'll let someone who knows more about it explain.

Don't make me bust out my alfa and show you otherwise Porgie!!

also on JimX,s point, why is it that the more cylinders you have, the smoother the engine (or exhaust note) gets, except for V8's.

For example, a 12 sounds smoother than a 10, which sounds smoother than a 8 which DOESN't sound smoother than a 6 or a 4.

It's a bit hard to compare i guess, cause most people, when they think V8, think of GM/Ford V8's, whereas most 10's and 12's are made by prestige marques. I guess we need to compare a Ferrari V8 to a Ferrari V12 to check properly...anyone care to indulge me? :D

Belly_up, I think a lot has to do with the firing order. The GM Gen III sounds a lot smoother than the previous Holden engine, and the only fundamental difference is the firing order. I think they changed it to smooth out the idle. You can get some of the sound back with a decent exhaust (most I've heard are crap) but it still doesn't sound as rumbly as the old Holden V8's or even the current Ford V8's.

That said, even a "rough" sounding V8 is still quite smooth in a driving sense.

Originally posted by Belly_up

also on JimX,s point, why is it that the more cylinders you have, the smoother the engine (or exhaust note) gets, except for V8's.

cause no one wants a smooth 8. they want a grumpy 8 with a huge cam and blap blap blap idle. muahahaha

ahem, i'll just go to my corner now.:uhh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes that’s what im trying to decide. Should I do stock gtt box or enclosed or open pod. 
    • Also, I note OP is in Melbourne, which begs the question... are you aware of how illegal your car will be with a turbo, and intercooler and any sort of filter change? I don't know how you can get past the "2 intake mods" "rule" that seems to exist in Vic. Fully engineered might or might not get you there.
    • If you have a turbo... then the ducting holes I used to feed the pod are not available because your intercooler likely uses them. If you have an intercooler, your IAT's are going to be goverened by how good your intercooler setup is. I'm yet to really see anyone check IAT with a snorkel/boxed pod/proper CAI versus and unshielded pod. It would be interesting! But I suspect that the differences would not be so noticeable as if you were N/A as the intercooler is where the air is being cooled.. and out in front where the FMIC would be is a pretty good spot for it.. When I was turbo I pushed the stock GTT box as far as I could and made some pretty good power out of it, and noticed on the street I never made the same power/boost. Then I did a before and after run with a pod filter versus the box and picked up about 9PSI from the same boost duty cycle and about 50KW instantly. I never ran the stock box again, and recently removed it for my N/A setup. The box is restrictive to a degree - Even with the V8 setup I noticed I picked up power by removing the box completely, so punching holes from the bottom of it to get air from the passenger guard *helps* but the most effective one in my case was simply having the ducts, a pod, and no box around it. In my experience, *more* air was better than cold air. The air (with ducts) will be cooled off as you start moving, and especially if you start moving fast (a race track). It actually moves around quite a bit as you can see.  
    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
×
×
  • Create New...