Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Since I got my car a couple of years ago I have always wondered why I didnt get any boost while reving the car at idle. I originally thought this is normal due to the larger Garret TD-04 on my RB20 but I was never sure.

Anyways to put it simply, if I rev my car at idle (after being warmed up) the AVCR will never show positive boost (you can hear the turbo isnt spooling no BoV etc). I am running a Garret TD-04 with GTR frontmount, APexi Bov connected to a wastegate and screamer pipe. Is this normal? I can provide more details, pictures, video etc if any1 needs more info.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162250-no-boost-when-stationary-problem/
Share on other sites

engine load makes exhaust gas

exhaust gas drives the exhaust wheel

the exhaust wheel drives the compressor wheel

the compressor wheel drives boost pressure

as there is no engine load the exhaust wheel doesnt spin fast enough

which in turn doesnt drive the compressor fast enough

which in turn makes little or no positive manifold pressure

Ye, but the rear housing for the Mitsu's is not the same as what the skyline is going to use.

If someone has put a Mitsu turbo onto an RB... what a bloody headache that would have been.

Check the rear housing dude if you can.

See what it looks like ;)

I need a pic of the other side.

That looks like a T04E .5AR compressor housing to me. Seems to have a 2.5" inlet. That's the exact same compressor cover i had on my "50 trim" T3/T4 on my previous 4G63T Eclipse motor.

In the DSM side of things in the states in around 2003-2004 the big thing was to match T04E Compressor covers with TD05H turbine housings. You may have that type of turbo installed.

Can you clarify "When I bought the car it said it was a TD-04" (what is "IT") is that a sale description?, or is that what you see on the turbine housing?

Edited by silman
Ye, but the rear housing for the Mitsu's is not the same as what the skyline is going to use.

If someone has put a Mitsu turbo onto an RB... what a bloody headache that would have been.

Check the rear housing dude if you can.

See what it looks like ;)

Who said it was the same? you said that no TD turbo was manufactured by Garrett - Wrong.

What?, TD05H-20G AND TD06-20G turbo's are very common on Skylines.

Ok, so garrett saying they didnt make a TD04 was slightly incorrect.

My apologies. They made a few insignifgant models.

I know the whole TD0X range is common, but look who its made by, and look @ the rear housing.

Its not the mitsu rear housing is it? No.

Who said it was the same? you said that no TD turbo was manufactured by Garrett - Wrong.

What?, TD05H-20G AND TD06-20G turbo's are very common on Skylines.

You were right nismod, garrett didn't make any TD turbos, They made garrett turbos with oddball housings to suit mitsu flanges. The TD description cannot be applied to a garrett turbo as it describes a mitsu turbo

http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=BCS

hmmmmmm.......this looks like your turbo silman and the product description says t28. I also know that the comp wheel on your turbo is definately old 25 styles and looks very similar to the plain bearing sr turbos of the 90's.

What?, TD05H-20G AND TD06-20G made by mitsubishi with garrett style exhaust housings? That must make them mitsu manufactured garretts!

You were right nismod, garrett didn't make any TD turbos, They made garrett turbos with oddball housings to suit mitsu flanges. The TD description cannot be applied to a garrett turbo as it describes a mitsu turbo

http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=BCS

hmmmmmm.......this looks like your turbo silman and the product description says t28. I also know that the comp wheel on your turbo is definately old 25 styles and looks very similar to the plain bearing sr turbos of the 90's.

What?, TD05H-20G AND TD06-20G made by mitsubishi with garrett style exhaust housings? That must make them mitsu manufactured garretts!

Before you make more of an ass of yourself I suggest you go to www.dsmtalk.com and use the search button to look at what turbo came stock on the mitsubishi eclipse second generation - from 1995-1999. Perhaps you would most likely recognise this shape of car as the green eclipse from the fast and the furious, except the car in that movie was a non turbo 420a 2.4 non turbo fwd. The turbo i pictured is a TD04/T25G that was made by Garrett and assembled at Illinois on the 4G63T engines that were made in japan before being shipped to the usa to be assembled in the cars. they were all left hand drive vehicles. some made there way back to Japan, others made it to europe and even Taiwan. When turbo naming conventions are discussed the turbine side is always the denominator - eg T3/T4 or TD05H-20G. There is no difference here - TD04/T25G.

Where did i say that the TD05 AND TD06 was manufactured by mitsubishi with a garrett style housing? This was a turbo most notceably made by forced performance to cater for the aftermarket scene before they all decided to concentrate on going completely Garrett. If you actually read what I typed it said that the Garrett COMPRESSOR HOUSINGS were mated to the mitsubishi TURBINE HOUSINGS. IE on the 1st generation eclipse from 1989- 1994 the TD05-14B was modified to fit the garret cold side compressor wheel and compressor cover.

Thats real nice, we're already reverting to name calling :sick:

You said

What?, TD05H-20G AND TD06-20G turbo's are very common on Skylines.

I said

What?, TD05H-20G AND TD06-20G made by mitsubishi with garrett style exhaust housings? That must make them mitsu manufactured garretts!

How was your comment relevant? Other than to point out that mitsubishi do manufacture T3 flanged turbos in the same way that garrett manufacture oddballs, yet we dont call a t3 flanged TD05 a GT2871 and we dont call a TD06 a GT30. That was my point.

So i will say it again, just so that i can make a bigger ass of myself as you put it. I'll even put it in capitals.

GARRETT DO NOT MAKE TD04'S. MITSUBISHI MAKE TD04'S

The turbo pictured is a T25 with oddball housings (and core for that matter).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...