Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My friends wants to turbocharge his 1600cc VW engine.

I want to use a R32 standard turbo as i can use my old dump pipe, etc, etc.

The tricky part of the conversion is, the carby needs to be located prior to inlet of turbo.

As it needs to be a suck through system. So the Dynamic seal inside the R32 turbo would need

to be changed to a Carbon seal so that fuel can pass through the turbo.

What would happen if a ran a setup with a pod on the inlet and a SU carby prior to inlet manifold,

will this work so that i can leave the turbo seal alone?

Someone has said that the increase of pressure may cause the SU to run incorrectly....

Edited by lows_13
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162317-r32-turbo-onto-1600cc-vw-motor/
Share on other sites

Carburetted turbo setups are not nice but anyhow .

You mentioned a "Blow Through" system which means the turbocharger literally blowing air through the carburettor and into the engine .

When the carburettor is on the atmosphere side of the turbocharger (upstream) is is said to be suckthrough . Actually the term is nonsensical because the turbo can't "suck" , it can create a depression or area of lower pressure before the carburettor and then its up to the atmosphere to "push" the air through .

Both systems are poor because .

1) Blow through : The whole carburettor/s need to be enclosed in a box so that positive pressure doesn't blow air out of every orifice the carby has ie throttle plate shaft/s . You have to pressurise the float bowl/s otherwise positive pressure blows fuel out the jets rather than the air stream drawing fuel in through the venturis . According to David Visard you need to put rings inside the throats of an open choke carburettor in an attempt to make it boost sensative . Different situation with constant depression carbs like SU's or CD Strombergs .

Provided you get on top of all these issues its usually the better method . You don't have to bother with a carbon or dynamic (mechanical face seal) doing it this way provided the air filter has no noticable pressure drop .

2)"Suck Through" : This really is a crude read shitty system . The carburettor is upstream of the turbo so from its point of view it just has what it thinks is a larger engine drawing on it . It all gets bad because the throttle mechanism is upstream of the compressor housing so this see's lower than atmospheric pressure , lower pressure than is inside the turbos bearing housing so it tends to draw its lube oil out through the compressor end seal - if its a labirinth or piston ring type seal . Horror no 2 is that all of the engines air and fuel goes through the compressors housing and into the inlet manifold . Its all full of fuel vapor (wet systemn) so when you close the throttle its impossible to stop the engine running filthy rich on the over run . No3 , you have to then feed lots of fuel back in when you open the throttle in an attemp to get around the lean or flat spot . Very poor mixture control is the result . Single carb inlet manifolds are usually very crude and even then stupid things like overly rich mixtures are needed to cater for the worst fed cylinder . 4 Shoud the engine spit back or backfire there's lots of fuel and air in the inlet system and you can guess the result .

Really either system is only good for mild performance increases and don't get anywhere near the result of blow through multipoint EFI . You would have to rate very crudly made inlet manifolds with the cheapest nastiest EFI system available as lightyears ahead of carburetted turbocharger systems . The fact that the conversion is going on an NA engine is a worry because they are very easily damaged in a boosted environment .

My advise is don't do it , it will not be cheap/easy/effective so IMO not worth the effort .

Your call .

If you are ingenious and cluey enough to put a turbo on a v-dub engine, then u are ingenious and cluey enough to build an efi system for it. It will be more reliable, smoother and easier to tune and less likely to be a grenade waiting to explode. Upon my internet browsing I stumbled across www.megasquirt.info which is about a DIY efi project which seems cheap enough to set up if you're that way inclined. My last car before my r33 gtst was a 63 bug, and even with a stock engine it had pinging problems. So I suspect something would have to be done about the compression ratio.

Installing EFI is a option we have considered, we've yet to work out a rough cost though.

I'd imagine it would be at least $1000 +

I plan on making the turbo setup and running it, if the compression needs to be lowered

we have another motor we can re-build with lower compression

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Shouldn't need a "base map" for anything other than guidance to ignition tuning. You just need the engine capacity right, the injector size right, and something, almost anything, for a VE map. On an NA engine, fuelling is almost completely a function of load signal & rpm. It should run and drive with a completely flat fuel map. It will be too lean under load, but that's easily fixed. We used to tune all ECUs without any base map. There were no such things (until someone had tuned a near stock engine on one, and then they had a "base map".
    • What did you actually buy/how much did it cost? When I got mine in like.. 2017...? 2019? the aim was to run Torque for gauges via ODB2 and things like Track Addict/Laptimers/Dashcam/Reversecam/Spotify etc. Mine never broke, but I wonder if you've got the same needs (it sounds like it). Cause I liked the idea of being able to do anything with it. That said, yours also cost 3x the cost of what I spent so... food for thought.  
    • For me there is a massive difference in manufacturer or big brand crippled android (Sony, Kenwood etc) vs the sort of thing I've installed here, which is basically just a tablet in DIN form factor with open Android, and the other model of course is mirroring - Android Auto/Carplay. I hate the locked down manufacturer and AA options where they decide what apps I'm allowed to install, including the Launcher but also importantly things like Ecutek (for this car) or Real Dash (Stagea) are not supported. Plus those crippled versions tend to be slower due to both overheads and lower spec hardware. On the other hand, when this breaks I'll likely be in trouble for support....but how is that different to owning an Infiniti anyway
    • Yeah, Duncan is helping sell me back to Android devices. I've hated the whole Android head units due to their speed issues. Even in my old Hyundai Kona (2022 model), it behind the scenes was Android, and slow and shitty to start up. Once running wasn't bad, but still a good 15 to 30 seconds.
    • My roof rails are off atm on the E39 until the rust is fixed. I did find another little bit of surface rust under the rails when I took them off. As @soviet_merlin said I'd just leave them alone unless you're planning on ensuring they're properly sealed. I was on the fence about leaving them off as the delete is still a thing in BMW E39's but I feel like the car is missing something (er, it is, der) with them off and I'm looking forward to putting them back on.
×
×
  • Create New...