Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi skyliners,

i was wondering how fast some cars are from the lights as i am one of those people who hates to lose and i only really race if i think i am a chance.

ah...um...of course i am referring to the people who have dragged these at the LEGAL drags not on the street from the lights...errr yes that'll do...

1990s TX5 turbo

VT Commorore v6

magna 3.5 v6

1990s laser TX3 turbo

how would i fare with my 32gtst?

are there any other cars which i should watch out for other than the obvious 180's gtir's wrx's and the likes

Cheers,

Waz.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16303-how-fast-are-these/
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry about any on that list .... but watch out for S15 200SX's .... I only have Trust Power Extreme II zorst, pod intake and a bit o boost (11psi) and I run 13.33 @ 104mph in full street trim :P .... wait til I get a cooler and Power FC for some decent tuning (running so rich atm its not even funny!).

u will beat those cars listed...but frosty, u better go race a rex, theres no way a stock 32 will beat a rex, even with a zorst and pod ud really struggle, rex's r capable of 13s if driven right, as much as i hate to admit it, ive seen 32s with basic mods run 15s and high 14s at very best....

my car is auto as well so factor that into the equation

what if the TX5 turbo is modded? my mate is thinking of buying one and i wanna rape his car before he can say a word!

frosty, i am a full time student with no $$$ so my mods end where i see a price tag. the only thing i might consider is some kind of boost controller but would be one of the cheap (ie turbosmart) ones that are under $100. is this effective? what else could i do myself? i have drop in panel filter + CAI and i cut a hole behind the intercooler (replaced it with mesh so no rocks get in) :P

thanks,

Waz.

Originally posted by JET-33

u will beat those cars listed...but frosty, u better go race a rex, theres no way a stock 32 will beat a rex, even with a zorst and pod ud really struggle, rex's r capable of 13s if driven right, as much as i hate to admit it, ive seen 32s with basic mods run 15s and high 14s at very best....

unfortunately andrew ur wrong.

a stock WRX is nothing... it bogs down and most of them are driven by suits who cant change gears to save themselves.

only one i took on and got beaten by had a FMIC, POD, a bit more boost and a zorst.... i got up to about his rear wheel b4 we stopped.

and yes s15s arent to be under estimated :P got drilled by one the other week lol full exhaust, computer, boost, CAI Box and POD...

prob about 75

but i cant let it go until the other stuff goes aswell....

no in cabin adj, thats another unroadworthy bit

least this way u hide it in the engine bay and a cop wont c it...all u do is grab a screw driver to turn up and down, and lets b honest, as if ud eva turn it down...thats y i didnt get it anyway

better stop hijackin...pm me if u want to talk about it :P

Originally posted by JET-33

well i think u all underestimate rexies, and maybe u imagine too many mods sometimes

stock 32s run 15s.....rexies r def quicker than that......

stock? i think ur wrong there.

the new ones might be... but the older ones arent.

STis on the other hand.

u should drill them... i raced one the other night on half throttle and it couldnt get past... it stayed at about the same speed but didnt gain... it was wet and everytime i put the foot down (in 4th or 5th) the side stepped out so kept it half throttle.

supercharged v6 i took on at calder i beat by half a second.... so theyre nothing super either... 5.7litres will be a bit more challenging specially if theyre modified... my mates 300kw SS beats me.... just.

very tricky

ive mauled every vx clubby ive raced bu at the drags an el stock xr8 was up my ass the entire track...twicw

we do under estimate badly

nark, i hate to say a rex would beat u on the road and maybe me...but driver is a lot i give u that..a lot of em r poofs cos i beat a rex in the 87 integra once, haha

thanks guys ... took on a VN SS once about a month ago and i killed it by at least 3 carlenghts but i just assumed he wheelspun or something as i thought the v8 might be faster than my r32. sweet as i should have given my mate a go against his s15 200sx before he sold it. it was stock oz spec

Originally posted by inark

my mates 300kw SS beats me.... just.

i find that VERY hard to believe.

I race a 300KW GTS Monaro about a week ago.

From 2 runs starting at 80km upto 2** he lost once.

And the second time only had a car and a half on me cause i had to wait for my 4500rpm boost arrival (curse the lag)

But hey. I can handle geting beaten :P

u cant say what car is faster

you cant underestimate the car..

like i know a guy with a 13 secon tx5

and it looks like shit...

and ive spoke to a guy with a sigma who ran a 12.9... unless u see what sunder the bonnet

dont under estimate it..

and yes i think rexies woth and exhaust and boost will beat an r32 gtst with same mods

as much as i hate em.. i got drilled buy one... they mite not have the power

but they got all four wheels taking off where we only have the rear 2...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...