Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My car does burnouts everywhere - it's terrible (I have a r31 and look i'm not a bogan).

Anyway, was told the bush kits are going to be expensive to have pressed in so I'm wondering if anywhere does exchange and where people are buying this from!?!?

Most often than not armed with a hack saw, cold chisel, small/mini sledge hammer, and a drill with various drill bit sizes, a vice and or various exhaust pipe size to smash bushes in with you can replace basically any bush yourself. :O

Cubes - I was 'told' that it's hard to get in out, that's why I'm looking for exchange. I don't have a press and I don't see myself whacking things in... am I over complicating it? Is it really that simple? If it is I'll get a bushing kit and a hammer. ... btw what's the drill for?

T04 - Thanks for that... not keen on dealing with pedders, spose I can get over it but are their bushes/etc good?

I have a press but find I rarely use it. :)

I was told subframe bushes are difficult, I was also told castor rod bushes were difficult.

A drill with a drill bit ( to drill a bit of rubber out so you can get the hack saw in there), and hack saw a cut then smack it with a cold chisel (use the cold chisel on the cut you make) and its out. Easy as.

Even if you do struggle to get it out which I don't see why you would.

Pop down the local mechanics and have them press it out and the new in. They usually charge $10 or so per bush.

The hard bushes are the silicon filled bushes such as the subframe and castor rods on the R32's. Regular bushes are easy.

if you are going to pedders go to the one in artarmon. they are tops. a young guy and his dad own it, and the young fella has a nice STI so knows about performance. they sell whiteline etc bushes too.

A couple of things to know here , is it local or JDM ie 5 link or semi trailing arm IRS .

If its a locally sold sedan they have 4 parallel links and a panhard rod for lateral axle "location" . The upper parallel arms are much shorter than the lower ones which helps to keep the nose of the diff roughly aimed at the gearbox and keeps it away from the floorpan . The main issue with the differing arm lengths is "rear steer" with body roll and theres little you can do about that short of fabricating longer upper arms and the boxes that allow them to be mounted/housed above the floor pan in some areas . I think about the best you can do with the five link (for road) is remove the std arms and look for "air gaps" moulded into the rubber bushes . These are there to allow movement and make the bush more compliant . A cheap/easy mod is to fill in these gaps with a product called Stikaflex wich sets and forms the thing like a full rubber bush with less movement but some compliance . What you need to understand is that there has to be some compliance otherwise you load up the link mounting points on the body and axle housing to the point where things crack and break .

Four link/five link/trailing arm/semi trailing arm rear suspension have advantages and disadvantages , true multilink probably has the lowest number of disadvantages which is why most performance/upmarket cars now use them .

Cheers A .

Thanks for the info disco - I'm lucky to have you chime in on that.

My car is an ausline - so it is the 5 link thing and solid axle.

From what you're saying, the fabrication of longer upper arms and the boxes above the floor pan sounds like the ideal option. .. unfortunately I don't have a complex understanding of what you're describing, so I'd do it (the thing has no back seat and won't have anything in the boot etc) but I'd need someone who knew what they were doing supervising. This means it's not really an option :thumbsup:

As you suggest rear steer being caused by body roll perhaps I can mitigate it by adding bigger sway bars down the path. The thing already has some coilovers in it which have reduced body roll considerably.

I'm interested in the sikaflex idea, anything that stiffens stuff up without breaking it sounds good for what I'm trying to achieve. Will the air gaps be visible on the outside of the bush or will they be inside of it? If it's on the outside, when I get my new bushes I can fill it with sika - that's no problem. If it's inside, I guess I'd have to poke it in with a syringe or something? It might be hard finding a place to sell me a needle :\

Anyway, I went to my local sparts and the bushes were (from memory) roughly $125 and $145 (noltec). I reckon that's bloody expensive, on the positive side however the exchange arms were only $5 more expensive or thereabouts. Can anyone get any cheaper?

Thanks for reading if you made it this far O_o

Thanks for the info disco - I'm lucky to have you chime in on that.

My car is an ausline - so it is the 5 link thing and solid axle.

From what you're saying, the fabrication of longer upper arms and the boxes above the floor pan sounds like the ideal option. .. unfortunately I don't have a complex understanding of what you're describing, so I'd do it (the thing has no back seat and won't have anything in the boot etc) but I'd need someone who knew what they were doing supervising. This means it's not really an option :blink:

As you suggest rear steer being caused by body roll perhaps I can mitigate it by adding bigger sway bars down the path. The thing already has some coilovers in it which have reduced body roll considerably.

I'm interested in the sikaflex idea, anything that stiffens stuff up without breaking it sounds good for what I'm trying to achieve. Will the air gaps be visible on the outside of the bush or will they be inside of it? If it's on the outside, when I get my new bushes I can fill it with sika - that's no problem. If it's inside, I guess I'd have to poke it in with a syringe or something? It might be hard finding a place to sell me a needle :\

Anyway, I went to my local sparts and the bushes were (from memory) roughly $125 and $145 (noltec). I reckon that's bloody expensive, on the positive side however the exchange arms were only $5 more expensive or thereabouts. Can anyone get any cheaper?

Thanks for reading if you made it this far O_o

I can arrange Noltec replacement rear arms (inc adjustable panhard rod) if you want, PM for details.

:D cheers :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...