Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you take two pictures

one with bonnet on and one with bonnet off

using photoshop you 'cut' the bonnet area (can be a bit bigger as its all the same anyway) off the photo with it on, and transfer it to the pic with no bonnet

as it is a different layer, you can use the eraser or blender tool to remove the bonnet layer and make it look like the bonnet has a hole in it

tada....

Edited by 342Four

ive never done it like that lol!! eraser is only one pressure and wipes it all out >_<

use layer masks with the pics and blend them together with an air brush - comes up with a mad effect (especially where you want to blend the bonet with the engine at the edges) you just generally have more control over the picture you are putting together.

layer masks are a MUST if you want them to turn out as best they can :mellow:

hope this helps!

ive never done it like that lol!! eraser is only one pressure and wipes it all out :P

use layer masks with the pics and blend them together with an air brush - comes up with a mad effect (especially where you want to blend the bonet with the engine at the edges) you just generally have more control over the picture you are putting together.

layer masks are a MUST if you want them to turn out as best they can :P

hope this helps!

what program you using? no need to use masks or anything like that dude!

try adobe photoshop you will not go back!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...