Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it really depends on which evo he is referring to? EVO 1,2,3,4,5,6,6.5,7 or Evo 8 [which is out soonish]? ? ?

If its a really old evo like 1 or 2 then a 33 gtst would have more power definately, but you are still comparing a RWD with an AWD...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337206
Share on other sites

sigh - right back at you pal. when someone says

one of my mates is continually telling me evo's will shit on a R33 GTS-T
I think they are talking about performance and not looks. I agree with you that skylines are better looking...I wouldnt have bought one if i thought they were ugly...

I wouldnt waste my time trying to convince someone anyway...some people like skylines and some dont...does this friend actually own an Evo? What does he own?

If you want to entertain his silly school yard statements then tell him that the 911 Turbo Porsche will eat his lancer for breakfast, lunch and dinner!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337272
Share on other sites

Well EVOs are pretty cool cars.My VII is std with exhaust/ECU & ran a 13.4 @ 105. It does handle pretty well, but does feel like a gokart compared to the Skylines.It is an $80,000 car & it does drive like it, but I think for 1/2 the money, a GTSt is almost as powerful, handles almost as well, does look much better, & is a much nicer car to cruise in than the EVO.I do like the 7, but am not a fan of the previous models. For someone who does a few hillclimbs or rallies, & needs a 4dr sedan, then the EVO is the ultimate. But for normal street cruising & the odd drag off the lights I think the GTSt skylines are awesomes cars & great value.

If you get a chance - drive an EVO hard & you will be impressed,

but it will make you realise how nice your skyline is.

BTW - my 7 is for sale.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337389
Share on other sites

BTW - has your mate actually got an EVO? If not, whats his point?

He is comparing the top spec Mitsi, to the base spec Nissan!

comparing apples with apples - GTRs crap all over EVOs

& I should know!!! Remember a base spec lancer is a POS!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337423
Share on other sites

bryan...the new Evos r 2 litres.

i think it all comes down to where you do your playing...in tight situations, say gymkhana events, any Evo worth its salt will leave even a GTR for dead.

you really have to consider their pedigree to understand why these cars are like that. the Skyline evolved from Group A racing, and later on, Grand Touring Championship.

the Evo, on the other hand, evolved from rallies. thus, both cars were created for totally different purposes. from there, we can see why the Evo is relatively anorexic in weight as compared to the Skyline.

if we consider their built purpose, we find that it's hard to compare 2 such cars. stock for stock, the Evo would outsprint the same generation GTR to 100km/h. but the GTR was not made for such low speeds. take on the Evo in a rolling start from say 80km/h and you will understand why the Godzilla is the Godzilla.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337583
Share on other sites

I took an Evo VI one night (he even had the plates EVIL6 - yes it did go pft, pft turbo)... i am not sure what he was doing at the start, but he was definitely was *trying* to drag me. I was several lengths in front after few 10's of metres. I had to slow down as over the hill is "cop spot" but i dunno..either he was driving really really badly or i was killing him. It was up a hill, maybe the torque of the skyline had something to do with it?

Thing is EVO is going to handle great around corners, and it would be pretty nimble, and its got lots of other nice goodies like active yaw control and the like... great for rallying or cornering..but on the street in a straight line a modded R33 GTS-T can take one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337686
Share on other sites

rb26dett: hmmm.. recent case in point: Targa tasmania.. ok its a road race mainly and not true rally.. but hmmm which car came second?

the sheer stupidity than a RB26DETT can get to if enough money is thrown at it counters any advantage the EVO might have.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337694
Share on other sites

Hehehe...

I think people should not look at the EVO as a done up 1.8l fwd. The reason why Mitsu use the Lancer on the WRC cars is purely for marketing reasons. The entire EVO car is different and formdable weapon.

Last time I saw a EVO come up the street, it wasn't so much the speed which impressed me, the brakes! The way he pulled up to the corner in so little distance shocked me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337751
Share on other sites

First off, don't worry what your mate says. Tell him to go buy one and then come talk. The later generation EVO's are a quality car, but comparing it with a skyline of any form isn't a fair comparison. Put it up against a WRX STI and you've got two cars designed from the same sorts of moulds.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16461-evo-vs-skyline/#findComment-337777
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...