Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

oil surge....fuel surge. Both shit things especially in racing. Im surprised you know what one is and how to fit one up but yet not know the purpose behind it.

Yea well, like I said. It is not that I dont know WHAT it does. I just was unsure as to the real reason behind it. Thanks a lot for all of the info everyone.

I especially like the info on the Teflon braided hoses, I will have to be SURE to get those.

-Sayajin

Yea well, like I said. It is not that I dont know WHAT it does. I just was unsure as to the real reason behind it. Thanks a lot for all of the info everyone.

I especially like the info on the Teflon braided hoses, I will have to be SURE to get those.

-Sayajin

Yeh the teflon hose is where it's at, only problem is it requires different fittings from rubber hose so you can't use speedflow/earls nice colourful fittings with it they are normally just a silver fitting, more of an industrial type, on a good note though they are much cheaper :D What you spend on the hose you'll save on the fittings....

that's not true at all. I've used earls teflon line a number of times in the last 6 years or so, and the regular earls compression fittings fit on it no problem. you use it the same way as the stainless sheathed rubber hose. tape it, cut it, press in olive, assemble hose end. done. for fuel use I would then get it pressure tested to be safe.

hmmm, fair enough then. Was recommended to me to use specific teflon hose fittings and not rubber hose ones.....although I am not using the earls teflon hose it's an industrial brand, can't remember what it was...

Edit:

It says rubber and teflon line uses different fittings :D Maybe the guy in the shop I go to was unaware they make fittings for teflon hose....

well i can tell you with my own two hands i've fitted earls annodised compression fittings to teflon line. in fact if you follow the link it shows you pics of them. they work in exactly the same way as the rubber ones do. just possibly a slightly different wall thickness means they have two different product lines.

I've also got teflon hose fitted for my oil return to thhe sump with Earls anodised compression fittings connecting it up. Will use the teflon in place of my existing rubber braided lines to see if that eliminates the strong fuel vapour smell from the cabin. Otherwise it will be solid lines.

well i can tell you with my own two hands i've fitted earls annodised compression fittings to teflon line. in fact if you follow the link it shows you pics of them. they work in exactly the same way as the rubber ones do. just possibly a slightly different wall thickness means they have two different product lines.

Ok spoke to the guy in the shop again today when I was down there getting bits, he said you can use fittings for rubber braided line on teflon but they won't hold up to as much pressure, the fittings specifically designed to be used with teflon braided line (yes I know earls have a line of them too I thought I made that clear) actually bite into the line to give a better seal. In our case with fuel lines we are using teflon because it doesn't weep like rubber does, but generally people go to teflon lines because they hold more pressure than rubber. But if you want to use them for high pressure (3000psi odd) you need to use a completely different swaged on fitting anyway :nyaanyaa:

So who sells the best surge tank??

gcg website is down, and are's site is rubbish. Im thinking ill have to get off my ass and pay them a visit.

Also how many Ltrs does one need to be?

People run from 2-5L. Call up some fabricators as well, as some alloy pipe, with two ends and some threaded pipes handing out of it, cant cost as much as some of the surge tanks going around.

I'm not familiar with earl's, but the in the speed flow range teflon fittings are black and blue (instead of rubber braid fitting's being red and blue).

no. thats just part of there range. the normal ones are blue and red. in both brands

heres some hard lines i made for a s15picture041vi8.jpg

picture036ka5.jpg

no. thats just part of there range. the normal ones are blue and red. in both brands

heres some hard lines i made for a s15picture041vi8.jpg

picture036ka5.jpg

Niiiice. Hey Dave, are the pumps outside the boot? How come the feeds also enter the top, do they go down to the bottom of the tank? Also what the wires going to the top?

Cheers!

its a sard twin pump surge tank. all inclosed. i uses two gtr pumps or bosch or whatever you can fit in it hehe. very neat option

Dude thats a great set up real professional,where can i buy that surge tank from,and have you done the same set up to a r34 gtr yet?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • Yuh, but that one is NLA. There might be an equivalent, but I haven't looked.
    • If you hadn't bought a stand alone one already, nismo make a bolt on adjustable FPR https://www.efisolutions.com.au/nismo-fuel-pressure-regulator-sr-rb-s13-180sx-r32
    • I know and understand they are principally the same. They both cause lock under decel, but the 1.5 nomenclature implies "half" or less locking force, or it allows for more slip or a speed differential between both wheels. Right now the driving manners with the 2 way is pretty rough on transient to full off throttle in the backroads. In other words letting off the throttle too rough is not forgiving, great for drifting, tougher for controlled grip driving.      Yeah, I have watched that video a couple times, I am more so just looking for the confirmation that both part numbers offer the same ramp architecture and are just different settings from the factory.     38420-RSS15-B5  38420-RSS20-B5
×
×
  • Create New...