Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanx mate ...

yeah .. u can feel some increas in power ... some times i put very cooled water in the tank just to test .... damn u feel alot of power.. am thinking ..u can put some ice in the tank.. lol that would be cool :closedeyes:

So I was thinking about this, and then I was thinking about my little car fridge getting a bit run over by a trailer rendering it working, but ugly. Then I thought, I could possibly use the ugly car fridge to cool the water for the intercooler sprayer.

I figure there are two ways to do this.

1. Remove the metal element from the fridge and have it sitting under the water bottle I use for the sprayers.

2. Cut a rectangular hole out of the bottom of the water bottle and fit the cooling element in there, sealing the edges with silicon or something.

I think the second method would be more affective as there is direct contact between the cooling element and the water, however I am not sure wether it would be ok to have the element in direct contact with liquid. (I guess it would be ok as long as none of the other components were exposed to water, anyone know?)

Do you think this would have a worthwile effect on the temperature of the water?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165930-would-this-work/
Share on other sites

why dont you just do the cheaper option and use garden water sprayers, your fmic will be colder even with normal temp water just due to the air hitting the water

Thats how I set it up, I just noticed when I was fiddling with it that the water was quite warm due to the engine bay temperature. If the water temperatutre could be significantly decreased, wouldn't the performance increase?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165930-would-this-work/#findComment-3073463
Share on other sites

I would relocate your resevoir to outside the engine bay. Have you tested the "fridge" to see how cold the water can get, and more importantly how fast it cools a litre or 2 of water?

That may be just as effective.

I haven't tested the fridge as such, because it said on the instructions no to fill it wth liquid (I assume this is because it is not 100% sealed). It does cool 9 cans down noticeably within 20 mins or so, or if they are coolish already it will cool more. I figure if the car was cold when it was started, the fridge would at least maintain the cool temperature of the water, combating the engine heat that would otherwise be warming the water.

I guess mounting the resovoir outside the enginebay in a place with good airflow would have the same effect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/165930-would-this-work/#findComment-3073470
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...