Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i also heard of this happening so i got a stainless one fabricated for me for 100-150 cant remember when i put on a Z32afm and a few other things, being stainless it looks good as well as serves a good purpose... also it stops the pod from moving so i didnt need to put a bracket to hold it steady.. didnt think the price was too bad

can anyone confirm that the stockR33 turbo will need a 3-2.5 inch silicon reducer?

Ditto, i would really like to know the same thing before i go and buy the wrong one, i just need confirmation that the stock turbo inlet is 2.5"??

Cheers

P.S, i should hopefully be starting sometime this week and will be using 3" polished alloy pipe insteas of stainless

i had my stock rubber pipe on and made 191rwkw wit usual mods + safc and gt2535 on 14psi ona r33, changed my plugs and took my stock rubber pipe in2 an exhaust place, the copied it, changed me $40, also put the small pipes for the plumback and oil breather.

slaped it on and got a retune and made 200rwkw, plugs wouldnt have made me more kilowatts, so the $40 must have made me some power as i didnt touch the engine before

Definatly agree with changing it to make it more solid. One of the guys at my work had it happening to his 180sx. He said he just fed in a steel coil spring like thing. No problems after that. But personally id go the alloy way. If your gonna go through the hassle of playing around with it u may aswell change it all together, not to mention tidy it up a bit. In my opinion the stock rubber pipe is an ugly piece of sh*t that lets that side of the engine bay down and makes it look cheap and nasty haha. Metal will make a world of differance

Finally i have found out what size the turbo inlet is, thanks NYTSKY for measuring your turbo for me :D, it is 59mm which is 2.25", so i have just ordered my 3" 90degree alloy pipe and 2.25" -3" silicon reducer, hopefully i will have this finshed sometime this week if im lucky, i will post pics of the finished product.

yes the turbo inlet is 2.25 inch,

I have fitted a 3 inch metal pipe and the car doses but not what i expected, im gonna try get a brass pipe thats 2.25 inch and see what happens.

Doses?? wtf??

And what do you mean by "not what i expected", does the car run fine or does it run different to when you had the stock intake pipe?

by dose i think he means like flutter (dose = vl talk ie rubbish)

also why would you go brass? the material used wont change sound and id rather go 3" to 2.25" it would be forcing the air in more aggressive in my opinion.. 2.25" all the way seems like a waste, i mean the outlet for afm is 3" why go smaller??

by dose i think he means like flutter (dose = vl talk ie rubbish)

also why would you go brass? the material used wont change sound and id rather go 3" to 2.25" it would be forcing the air in more aggressive in my opinion.. 2.25" all the way seems like a waste, i mean the outlet for afm is 3" why go smaller??

I hear that the material that the pipe is made of and its thinkness makes a difference to the fluter sound, with a 2.25" pipe the flutter should sound different which is what I want and performance does bother me because im doing it for the sound-experiment

  • 2 weeks later...

Good news, i finally finished the intake pipe an have taken lots of pics, i made it so it fits up to the stock airobx and i can also use a pod aswell

The parts i used were: 1 x 3" 90 degree 600mm long alloy bend, 1 x 3" 45degree silicone joiner, 1 x 3" - 2.25" silicone reducer, a small length of alloy pipe that is the same size as the stock plumback pipe,some radiator hose from super cheap (i think it was the bottom hose from some triumph, it fits the stock plumback line perfectly) some old plumback line that i had leftover from when i installed the RIPS plenum on my old car,some clamps, 1 x local engineer for the welding lol

Heres the pics

The pipe was 600m long so it required a lot of cutting to get to the exact length

100_1817.jpg

100_1818.jpg

I had a little peice of alloy pipe welded on the bottom of the intake pipe which connects to the modified plumback line, i was orginally going to have the plumback line connect to the top of the intake pipe just like it is stock but there wasnt much room so i decided to do it this way.

100_1819.jpg

100_1820.jpg

How it looks from underneath the car

100_1827.jpg

Modified plumback line, this was a bit tricky to make as it had to clear the aircon pump bracket and then curve underneath the intake pipe, it needed lots of cutting, rotating and welding, it was probly the most diffucult part to make work and look stock

100_1829.jpg

100_1830.jpg

100_1831.jpg

100_1834.jpg

100_1832.jpg

100_1823.jpg

100_1824.jpg

100_1825.jpg

The kool thing about it is you cant see it in the engine bay unless you have a really good look

100_1835.jpg

100_1837.jpg

The car runs fine with it , i have only tried it with the stock airbox at the moment and the induction noise does seem to be a bit louder, i have not tried it with a pod yet though.

Edited by nizmo_freek
That looks really good mate, I'm thinking of going back to the standard airbox like you've done. That looks almost factory if the hoses and pipe were black.

Cheers mate, i was originally going to use black joiners and paint the alloy pipe black but i cudnt find any black silcione joiners, you can barely even see the pipe/joiners ,you would never know its there unless you have a real good look.

^^^ Thats exactly what i did to mine as well...good job...only difference is that i bought the pipe with the BOV plumbback and breather fittings already welded on...which made it a pain to adapt to the standard hoses...but nothing a bit of backyard ingenuity couldn't fix...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
    • @dbm7 and @GTSBoy thank you both very much! will give that a shot!
×
×
  • Create New...