Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its not unheard of. Case in point - The current Holden Barina is inferior to the model it replaces, as Holden have obviously decided a lower priced/lower quality car will better suit the marketplace.

This doesn't apply, as Holden sources these cars from other GM brands, it doesn't desgin and build them itself like Nissan Japan did with the Skyline. Holden decided to switch from the European "Opel Corsa", to the cheaper Korean "Daewoo Kalos", while keeping the Barina name. Nissan obviously didn't do this.

It was not a comparison, I was answering his question but I guess you missed that bit.

Maybe, but it doesn't relate to this argument though does it? So its not relevant.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3105623
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This doesn't apply, as Holden sources these cars from other GM brands, it doesn't desgin and build them itself like Nissan Japan did with the Skyline. Holden decided to switch from the European "Opel Corsa", to the cheaper Korean "Daewoo Kalos", while keeping the Barina name. Nissan obviously didn't do this.

Maybe, but it doesn't relate to this argument though does it? So its not relevant.

Seriouly, I BEG that you read before you post things like this.

Smurf said:

Why would a car manufacture release a new model that isnt superior to the previous model?

Holden, have "released" their "new model" barina and it is NOT superior to the "previous model"

He asked a question and I answered it.... And then you tell me it does not relate to the argument.... I WAS ANSWERING HIS QUESTION...... PLEASE FFS don't make me say it again! :rant:

I know that the new barina is sourced from Daewoo but it is still the car Holden have released as the NEW barina!

Edited by r32line
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3107149
Share on other sites

in my opinion, a R33 puts power to the ground ALOT better than a tail happy, tyre frying R32 does. The R33 feels like a much more stable car and when lightly modified, is still a comfortable off boost daily driver. THe R32 is like a go kart, actually similar to a S13!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3107229
Share on other sites

I just picked up my R33 gtst, and after been in mates cars not actually driving them i can notice a diff that the R33 is much smoother

in my opinion, a R33 puts power to the ground ALOT better than a tail happy, tyre frying R32 does. The R33 feels like a much more stable car and when lightly modified, is still a comfortable off boost daily driver. THe R32 is like a go kart, actually similar to a S13!

couldn't agree any better there about boost their like a normal car .. IMHO..

Edited by Yme33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3107299
Share on other sites

Hahaha, i dont agree with that statement at all. You cannot apply rules like 16% more power but only 6% more weight means its faster... I know the R33 is quicker (in a straight line) but just because one cars power to weight ratio is better than another cars it does not mean that car is going to be faster. How a car puts its power down introduces countless other variables....Tyres, AWD vs RWD vs FWD, Traction control system, launch control.... I wont bother continuing

I did say 'simplistically'. As for how the cars get their power down, I thought we were comparing GTS-t with GTS25-t? Both RWD without traction control/launch control. Both have VERY similar rear suspension (geometry, spring rates etc). We were comparing stock for stock, but I doubt anyone has stock tyres anymore, so we'll just assume same tyres for both, both have same sized rims so that shouldn't be a problem. Both have R200 VLSDs, so they'd both get the power down the same way there. Both have very similar gearbox ratios too. The difference is the R32 has a ~5% shorter diff ratio (4.363 vs 4.083 from memory) which would increase acceleration compared to the R33. But R33 has more torque at the engine to start with, so it's negated, leaving the R33 faster.

I realise you can't use power to weight all the time, but these 2 cars are VERY similar, so in this case, you can and it does work. The R33 IS faster in a straight line.

Edited by salad
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3110390
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
LOL

put an RB25 into an R32 ;)

then you get the power in a much nicer looking car.

sorry just had to say it

But then this whole discussion would prove pointless :(

Coming from a Honda background.. people always go on about Hondas being gay because they are small,light and reasonably qucik. My ITR, was just on 1000kg. Has a tiny 1800cc NA motor and would do 13.8 @ 100mph all day.

Then you get the people in their bigger Turbo cars saying things like " Well if my ****** was that light it would be 10x qucker than that shit ass Honda..." Is it me or is it just them trying to make their penises look bigger? *shrugs*

Kinda went off track. :thumbsup: My bad.. continue :( (would like to add im am currently in the market for an R33.. so im not a Steriotypical Honda driver :excl: )

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3138583
Share on other sites

Why nissan even bothered to make a 6 cylinder 2 litre engine is beyond me. It just added unnecessary weight to the 32. They already had some brilliant 2 litre engines laying around and should have used one of them.

As for looks, Every time i see a 32 I look for a backward baseball cap in the near vicinity or in the car itself.

The 33 is far more classic coupe design and will be the most timeless of all of them in the long run including the 34. (guess which one I drive) :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/167183-33-vs-32/page/2/#findComment-3145039
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • A 1.5 way is a 2 way. It is just a 2 way with a less aggressive ramp on overrun.
    • The ABS and/or TCS being missing/broken will not cause the engine to misbehave. It just casues CEL to come on and annoy you. The CEL is useless if it is always on, so you have to do the things you have to do to get rid of it, so it can be useful. Being a Stag ECU, then yes, it will not expect TCS to be present. But it will expect ABS to be present and working. You will need to either make the ABS CU talk to the ECU (don't ask me what that will take on an NA R34), and make sure the hardware is working....or, you just need to blank it out in Nistune. Do not persist with the stock ECU. You will just have problems. Gte it Nistuned. Start from there. DO YOU HAVE A BOOST SENSOR? The ECU's boost sensor that it. It is connected to the loom at the rear of the coil cover. Usually rides on the firewall on an R34, but is usually bolted down to a bracket along with all the other crap at the back of the coil cover when a Neo is dropped into another car. If you do not have it, the ECU will shit the bed. So, do you have one?
    • So sadly the fuel pump etc was not it. The pump and filter is new and it is still cutting around 4000 rpm. A read something about ABS/TCS (engine is from stagea and ECU too so no TCS) and i dont know for 100% that my car has ABS. It has ABS "cube" in engine bay but i dont think it works(or at least from my braking experience). Can be something like that?  I will be driving the car next week to Nistune tuner to properly see what is wrong...  
    • the Tomei LSD fluid with lsd kit. frustrated that it was shaking the car to crap and affecting everything else negatively, I pulled the diff last night, and removed the lsd carrier, could not find anything wrong, however it seem to be 100 locked up acceleration, and deacceleration, wondering if they sent me a 2 way not a 1.5??  either way I installed the stock open carrier back in place. test drove everything smooth as butter again. no shake, shutter, random, what felt like clutch slip and grab or drive shaft play, etc. something differently wrong in side the lsd. I might bother taking it apart (if possible) to figure out what's going on inside this carrier, as bought too long ago to return.  only draw back is its back to a one wheel wonder.
×
×
  • Create New...