Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm currently building an RB25/30 for my 32, would a standard GTR plenum fit on an RB20 25 or 30? if so wouldn't that be the best bet with the multiple throttle bodies? or some thing simpler like a greddy?

i would also like to no if a gtr plenum could go straight onto a 25?? also the ebay "greddy" plenums they say they are a copy, good or bad idea

Seriously dont know why people bother with these cut and shut stock plenums. If you want a forward facing plenum then fair enough, so do I, but if your going to do it then do it properly and get something like a Greddy or Plazmaman plenum. These companies have spent lots of time and money trying to perfect the flow characteristic of their product and saved you all the hard work, so I think the extra money is well worth it.

Plus they look a shitload better than modified stock, plazmaman especially.

l_78f349979a4eefeed31e2ef1cc65eecc.jpg

Here is my plenum... I'm not sure what it is as the previous owner just said it was 'custom'. It's using the standard throttle body.... my head gasket just blew the other night... not sure if this is related to the damages as im still trying to grasp a better understanding on mechanics.

l_78f349979a4eefeed31e2ef1cc65eecc.jpg

Here is my plenum... I'm not sure what it is as the previous owner just said it was 'custom'. It's using the standard throttle body.... my head gasket just blew the other night... not sure if this is related to the damages as im still trying to grasp a better understanding on mechanics.

Feck me, nice car to be "learning teh mechanics" theres some heat in that bay for sure

  • 2 months later...
yes gtr plenum can fit onto an rb25 head. Blitz makes a bolt-on adopter kit its worth about $700 and then you have to buy the gtr plenum and sort out the injectors . and blitz made a comment that it wont work with a std ecu

Do you or somebody else do know where i can get this Blitz adapter kit ? I would be very thankful if somebody could help me.

Edited by Behind Horizon

I would not like to use the std plenum just sealed at the center and a hole put for the inlet at the front because of obvious uneven distribution.

I built my plenum with care to try to avoid this problem but probably would have been better to buy Plasmaman/Subzero etc.

i'm just checking that you really think it has lowered intake temps by 30 degrees?

exactly how and where did you measure this?

ps. i have measured mine at the plenum so i have a pretty good idea why you won't lower intake temps by 30 degrees when you remove a little pipework.

i'm just checking that you really think it has lowered intake temps by 30 degrees?

exactly how and where did you measure this?

ps. i have measured mine at the plenum so i have a pretty good idea why you won't lower intake temps by 30 degrees when you remove a little pipework.

well i guest you dont tune cars then sore the temp drop on my haltech,mates ems and motec all 10sec cars guest that proves that it works

hey bud i have used a cut standard one for the past 2 years without any problems and so have a some of my friends. your intake temps will drop by about 30 degress which = hp

When was the last time you tore down the motor to check for uneven wear to back up your claims?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...