Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As it seems a few people from the club are going to the Queens Birthday track day organised by circuit club, I would try to make a list of who is going, so we can have an SAU presence there, maybe even head down in a group.

Details for the track day:HERE

I am booked in and am also trying to organise a garage so we have a spot to change wheels and store our stuff.

Please post here or PM if you are confirmed for this day and I will add you to the list.

For those who want to cruise down to Wakefield together, I can meet at Casula Bunnings car park at the cross roads from 6:30am leaving at 6:45am. This is located where the Hume Hwy splits into Camden Valley Way and Campbelltown Road. There is a link to a map on the second page.

I think this is a good spot as it is near the M7 and M5 and it is easy to get on the Freeway and head to Goulburn from this point.

Let me know who wants to meet up from here and PM me if you want my mobile to co ordinate things.

CONFIRMED:

Apollo (Me)

padey

tjandriesen aka "TJ"

scathing

Knockout Ned

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169631-circuit-club-wakefield-11062007/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah I'll be there, along with a few mates.

Unfortunatly my car is only half sorted. I'm still waiting on my new front springs/other suspension bits to arrive and some cam gears and timing belt.

Knowing my luck, they wont arrive. But i'll have a stack of fun anyway.

wish i could make it, but too close to gold coast autosalon and that has sucked up all my money. I really wanted to get down there on some track rubber instead of the crap i used last time, mind you i still managed a 1:14 :thumbsup:

NEWS FLASH FOR THIS EVENT

I have just been informed that Circuit Club is having trouble arranging the timing equipment for this event. The usal company that does the timing is tied up with the V8 supercars.

So it may NOT be a timed track day!!!

I will still be going, I just hope they can arrange an alternative for timing.

Anymore SAU people coming as I need to let them know how many garages we need?

That means we are down to only 3 people from SAU for this event.

Is no one else up for a track day?

I'm a tenantative yes for this one

If I can get my power steering fixed in time I'll head down for a spin! But so far, it's not looking good.

What time do we need to be there?

I'll be taking the M2/M7/M5---->Goulburn.

ap

I'll check but I assume 8:30-9:00 - figure a 2 hour drive that mean we leave Sydney 6:30-7:00?

I'm just north of the bridge so I can either go across thur the city and catch the M5 by the airport or around and catch it M7 down.

I am now a maybe for this event.

Went for a wheel alignment on the weekend and found that something is bent in the rear as I have over 7 degrees of toe in on one of the rear tyres.

Hopefully can find the problem and repair before this day.

If I make it I will be happy to meet up somewhere and drive down as a group.




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...