Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Quick question, stock boost, as I understand it, is controlled mainly by the actuator spring being rated to open at approx 7psi. Does this mean a) a higher rated spring will result in more boost and therefore B) a lower rated spring will result in less boost.

The reason I ask is i've recently fitted an EBC which has 4 settings as was thinking of replacing the spring with a lower rated one so I can run lower boost when it's wet but then use the EBC to wind it back up for dry.

Thoughts?

Cheers! :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/16972-changing-stock-actuator-spring/
Share on other sites

Yeah that's what I do akeenan. I don't really see the point to low boost and high boost settings. If I'm wanting to go fast I put my foot down. If I want to take it easy I just don't put my foot down as much. I have absolutely no problems with fuel economy either.

Anyway, to answer your question SeriesIIGTST - I think I understand what you want and that's to run lower than stock boost right? If so, then changing the spring should do this (at least in theory). I don't know of any computer problems that this might cause though. Someone else will jump in if I'm wrong I'd say :)

i just bought a 32 and it has a 2 stage boost controller on it. the guy i bought it off said that the owner in japan might have but a larger spring (or uprated) fitted to run higher boost. The boost controller & gauge was fitted here and it appears to be running 10psi on low (or when it came out here, as stock/normal boost). i wound it all the way down on the low setting and i cant get under 10psi.

Is it a 7psi spring or a 5psi spring? If the stock 2-stage solenoid bleeds off air to get more boost at high RPM, wouldn't it be a 5psi with the bleed allowing 7psi. I don't see how it could do it with a 7psi spring to only get 5psi boost. I have asked this before in threads where people have suggested removing the stock solenoid to have 7psi throughout the range, but no answers. Anyone?

I believe the 2 stage boost on the 33's was 5psi to 7psi, however it's hard to find a 33 with a stock exhaust to check, as the exhaust will alter the boost setting eg. my car had 7psi to 9psi with a 3.5" exhaust. So if I removed the solenoid I would have had 7psi throughout the whole rev range. You can also disconnect the solenoid from it's harness and wire up a switch in the cabin to feed the solenoid 12v constantly and then you would have the higher setting all the time (9psi) in my case. Another option is to wire the solenoid to open through a pressure switch or a micro switch on the throttle, just in case the constant 12v might make the solenoid too hot and burn out.

The actuators are a sealed item so I doubt it can be modified, you can buy them with a higher psi opening pressure but your always better off with a boost controller to raise the boost rather than a higher actuator, mainly because of wastegate creep. To illustrate, if you had a 12psi actuator at half throttle you would not have 12psi yet as the actuator would have already begun opening the wastegate and slowing the rate of boost increase, so you would need to be damn near full throttle to hold 12psi, now my EBC with the stock 7psi actuator gets me 12psi at 30% throttle which is much more responsive to drive, a cheap bleed valve would still see you at 12psi by about half throttle.

SeriesIIGTST, stock boost is 7psi, but it is staged from 5psi to 7psi

so you dont get the 7psi straight up. I dont know if running an aftermarket exhaust will prevent selecting such a low boost, but give it a try.

I wouldnt be in a hurry to put in a weaker wastegate acutator.

The reason is that the spring is not stiff enough to hold the wastegate shut against the pressure from the exhaust gasses aka wastegate creep.

The net result that you may not be able to wind boost up as far as you like.

For example a 14psi actuator will not allow the wastegate to open under 14psi, imagine if you had a 5psi actuator in there, and boost set to 14psi, the EBC has to do all the work between 5psi and 14psi, with a 14 psi actuator, the EBC only starts working when 14psi is reached,

or if you were to put a 10 psi acutator with stock boost control, you would get 10 psi straight up the same as if you had an EBC set to 10psi.

Turbomad, I think you may have got that one back to front? Big one last night?:D

You will probably find that from the 33's up the spring would have stock MAX boost at around 3 PSI. The boost solenoid then switchs the flow from the manifold on and off (PWM) to allow the higher boost, ie 5-7 psi. The reason for this is so if you have a major sensor failure and go into "LIMP" mode, the max boost you can have is 3 psi. (no power to solenoid, no boost)Try disconnecting the solenoid for boost and see what your maximum boost is, i'll wager its VERY low.

The waste gates on the 32's as far as iknow are NOT ECU controlled, therefore it IS the sprind in the actuator that controls max boost, therefore its only ONE stage, not 2.

No steve I havn't got it back the front, a 14psi actuator will begin to creep open before 14psi(that's what wastegate creep is), that actuator will give you 14psi but you will usually only get it at full throttle, That's why people buy EBC because they hold the wastegate shut for as long as possible without going over the preset level, and they deliver the preset level with very little throttle needed. Even Turbosmart bleed valves are gated (spring loaded ball bearing to keep air pressure from getting to the actuator too early) to eliminate wastegate creep.

kjb-r33 the R33's solenoid cannot lower boost to 3psi, it is normally closed and only opens around 5000rpm when the Variable Cam Timing switches back, all it does is open to bleed off a little air from the actuator thus increasing the boost 2psi, by dissconnecting it you will simply have your lower boost setting, 7psi with big exhaust and 5psi with stock one.

Thanks for all your replies. Looks like the only easy solution to lower boost is lower revs....bummer....i'm loving the more than standard boost anyway. Got my warning set at 0.85 bar and don't usually see much over 0.72 anyway.

Steve, maybe for people who want to run 20+psi the higher rate actuators may be necessary, when you run high boost it can create back pressure in the exhaust housing and as you said it can force the wastegate open to escape thus dropping boost a little but this is not wastegate creep. I had a larger comp wheel/housing on my VL turbo and it did that very thing, I tried a larger actuator but it didn't help in my case because the exhaust wheel/housing could not flow enough gas to run more than 12psi.

I'm against using higher actuators to raise boost because you can't go below that level, and most Skyline owners wont run more than 13psi anyway, which the stock actuator can easily handle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...