Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so did you have a whole core and wheels purchased?? then the housings machined or was the turbo built from parts??

I gave them a RB turbo and they had the VG30 out of a Nissan Cima.They chucked the cartridge and wheels and bought a Garrett cartridge with the wheels and shaft balanced and assembled in it.Then both the RB and 0P6 housings were machined to suit.Turbo charger was then assembled.

how did you come to that conclusion??

The numbers provided have no reference to the actual wheels being used in the turbo only the core.

Unless they purchased an entire core with matching wheels it wont be a 3076.

I dont think the Op6 housing will actually take that size exhaust wheel come to think of it.

Without removing the housings and measuring it up and working out the trims or talking to the builders its not possible to reference any numbers besides the core numbers.

I'm not going to argue the toss.

He said it was NEW cartridge, and supplied the CHRA number off the ID tag. No suggestion of interference or modification, just a new cartridge installed between Nissan housings.

That -0017 tag equates to a 52T T04S compressor mated with an 84T 60mm turbine. That data comes off a spreadsheet sourced directly from Honeywell. Unless there was some big quality control problem, it's unlikely that Garrett got it wrong.

Given the tag number, that's what I would say is in there.

HOWEVER, those who disagree, can. At this stage all that matters is probably giving the thing a run and seeing what it does. :domokun:

Edited by Dale FZ1
I'm not going to argue the toss.

He said it was NEW cartridge, and supplied the CHRA number off the ID tag. No suggestion of interference or modification, just a new cartridge installed between Nissan housings.

That -0017 tag equates to a 52T T04S compressor mated with an 84T 60mm turbine. That data comes off a spreadsheet sourced directly from Honeywell. Unless there was some big quality control problem, it's unlikely that Garrett got it wrong.

Given the tag number, that's what I would say is in there.

HOWEVER, those who disagree, can. At this stage all that matters is probably giving the thing a run and seeing what it does. :P

Once again Dale you are a wealth of turbo knowledge.Im off to Tassie tomorrow but will be getting the turbo fitted not long after i get back,cant wait. :domokun:

Oh and to my original question what would the turbo be compared with then??

I have no claims to fame, but here's a couple of suggestions:

1. The OE comp housing may strangle the potential flow capacity of the impeller. Physical size difference between this and the .70 A/R housing Garrett normally mounts up to that impeller suggests that the mass-air flow will be reduced. By how much is a guess but that side should (guessing) be able to support 240-250rwkW - maybe slightly more. I'd reckon with a .70, the compressor would be good for 280-290.

2. The OE turbine housing normally mates up to a MUCH smaller rotor. This one MAY present an excessive restriction at higher flows, leading to tuning issues to control knock if you wanted to run big boost. Still, if it was machined correctly and profiled to match up to the rotor, it may be quite ok. I'd guess this one is also likely to run out somewhere around the 240-250kW mark.

Overall? A bit slow to come on, pretty big mid range hit but top end petering out by comparison. Again, a guess only.

Keep us informed how it goes.

EDIT: I don't think it would be directly comparable to any off the shelf item, given the specs (and assuming they are correct of course).

EDIT 2: While you have the turbo off the manifold, get someone to drill and tap a suitable location near the collector to take a nipple/bung. With VERY LITTLE mucking around you could run a temporary pressure gauge and monitor what sort of backpressure this turbine actually created. You may have seen some other discussion that focused on that issue at length. On consideration, that is what I will be doing if I remove my turbo again. Low cost, and better understanding of what is going on. :domokun:

Edited by Dale FZ1

Adrian

Do you think this is similar to what I have in my R33 (i was the one that sold you the injectors).

I have still been to busy to get the actual specs on the turbo I got. All i know is that it runs nicely and I dont get any boost spiking.

Hi Trooper , its been a while hasn't it .

I tracked down your mate at Chippingnorton and he did did tell me the cartridge number in yours but thats about a thousand bits of paper ago . I remember he said they pressed a collar into your exhaust housing and machined it to suit the turbine which is a novel way to go about it .

The details escape me but at the time I thought it was not the way I'd go about it - something about the turbine being a little small for the compressor but its hard to be sure .

Those injectors are still in their boxes and will stay that way untill I get my hands on a Datalogit .

Cheers A .

Hi Trooper , its been a while hasn't it .

I tracked down your mate at Chippingnorton and he did did tell me the cartridge number in yours but thats about a thousand bits of paper ago . I remember he said they pressed a collar into your exhaust housing and machined it to suit the turbine which is a novel way to go about it .

The details escape me but at the time I thought it was not the way I'd go about it - something about the turbine being a little small for the compressor but its hard to be sure .

Those injectors are still in their boxes and will stay that way untill I get my hands on a Datalogit .

Cheers A .

G'day Adrian

I think soon all the specs will be 'lost' no one will remember what was put in - I dont really mind what is in there, as long as it works, its more responsive than the stock one and very streetable which is what I was after, still a shame they are not going ahead with the project.

I fried my PFC so just got that repaired at access :)

I am starting to get misfire problems, hoping its just a matter of gapping the plugs down.

Ready to upgrade injectors I think (again), I really want to change them but my tuner doesnt and he is the one with the knowledge. Making 260rwkw on stock injectors, stock FPR etc on 1.1 bar

Not sure what to change next. Injectors, Cams, Splitfires come to mind - but I just spent a lot of time having things tuned for economy so I dont really want to touch things for a while.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...