Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so did you have a whole core and wheels purchased?? then the housings machined or was the turbo built from parts??

I gave them a RB turbo and they had the VG30 out of a Nissan Cima.They chucked the cartridge and wheels and bought a Garrett cartridge with the wheels and shaft balanced and assembled in it.Then both the RB and 0P6 housings were machined to suit.Turbo charger was then assembled.

how did you come to that conclusion??

The numbers provided have no reference to the actual wheels being used in the turbo only the core.

Unless they purchased an entire core with matching wheels it wont be a 3076.

I dont think the Op6 housing will actually take that size exhaust wheel come to think of it.

Without removing the housings and measuring it up and working out the trims or talking to the builders its not possible to reference any numbers besides the core numbers.

I'm not going to argue the toss.

He said it was NEW cartridge, and supplied the CHRA number off the ID tag. No suggestion of interference or modification, just a new cartridge installed between Nissan housings.

That -0017 tag equates to a 52T T04S compressor mated with an 84T 60mm turbine. That data comes off a spreadsheet sourced directly from Honeywell. Unless there was some big quality control problem, it's unlikely that Garrett got it wrong.

Given the tag number, that's what I would say is in there.

HOWEVER, those who disagree, can. At this stage all that matters is probably giving the thing a run and seeing what it does. :domokun:

Edited by Dale FZ1
I'm not going to argue the toss.

He said it was NEW cartridge, and supplied the CHRA number off the ID tag. No suggestion of interference or modification, just a new cartridge installed between Nissan housings.

That -0017 tag equates to a 52T T04S compressor mated with an 84T 60mm turbine. That data comes off a spreadsheet sourced directly from Honeywell. Unless there was some big quality control problem, it's unlikely that Garrett got it wrong.

Given the tag number, that's what I would say is in there.

HOWEVER, those who disagree, can. At this stage all that matters is probably giving the thing a run and seeing what it does. :P

Once again Dale you are a wealth of turbo knowledge.Im off to Tassie tomorrow but will be getting the turbo fitted not long after i get back,cant wait. :domokun:

Oh and to my original question what would the turbo be compared with then??

I have no claims to fame, but here's a couple of suggestions:

1. The OE comp housing may strangle the potential flow capacity of the impeller. Physical size difference between this and the .70 A/R housing Garrett normally mounts up to that impeller suggests that the mass-air flow will be reduced. By how much is a guess but that side should (guessing) be able to support 240-250rwkW - maybe slightly more. I'd reckon with a .70, the compressor would be good for 280-290.

2. The OE turbine housing normally mates up to a MUCH smaller rotor. This one MAY present an excessive restriction at higher flows, leading to tuning issues to control knock if you wanted to run big boost. Still, if it was machined correctly and profiled to match up to the rotor, it may be quite ok. I'd guess this one is also likely to run out somewhere around the 240-250kW mark.

Overall? A bit slow to come on, pretty big mid range hit but top end petering out by comparison. Again, a guess only.

Keep us informed how it goes.

EDIT: I don't think it would be directly comparable to any off the shelf item, given the specs (and assuming they are correct of course).

EDIT 2: While you have the turbo off the manifold, get someone to drill and tap a suitable location near the collector to take a nipple/bung. With VERY LITTLE mucking around you could run a temporary pressure gauge and monitor what sort of backpressure this turbine actually created. You may have seen some other discussion that focused on that issue at length. On consideration, that is what I will be doing if I remove my turbo again. Low cost, and better understanding of what is going on. :domokun:

Edited by Dale FZ1

Adrian

Do you think this is similar to what I have in my R33 (i was the one that sold you the injectors).

I have still been to busy to get the actual specs on the turbo I got. All i know is that it runs nicely and I dont get any boost spiking.

Hi Trooper , its been a while hasn't it .

I tracked down your mate at Chippingnorton and he did did tell me the cartridge number in yours but thats about a thousand bits of paper ago . I remember he said they pressed a collar into your exhaust housing and machined it to suit the turbine which is a novel way to go about it .

The details escape me but at the time I thought it was not the way I'd go about it - something about the turbine being a little small for the compressor but its hard to be sure .

Those injectors are still in their boxes and will stay that way untill I get my hands on a Datalogit .

Cheers A .

Hi Trooper , its been a while hasn't it .

I tracked down your mate at Chippingnorton and he did did tell me the cartridge number in yours but thats about a thousand bits of paper ago . I remember he said they pressed a collar into your exhaust housing and machined it to suit the turbine which is a novel way to go about it .

The details escape me but at the time I thought it was not the way I'd go about it - something about the turbine being a little small for the compressor but its hard to be sure .

Those injectors are still in their boxes and will stay that way untill I get my hands on a Datalogit .

Cheers A .

G'day Adrian

I think soon all the specs will be 'lost' no one will remember what was put in - I dont really mind what is in there, as long as it works, its more responsive than the stock one and very streetable which is what I was after, still a shame they are not going ahead with the project.

I fried my PFC so just got that repaired at access :)

I am starting to get misfire problems, hoping its just a matter of gapping the plugs down.

Ready to upgrade injectors I think (again), I really want to change them but my tuner doesnt and he is the one with the knowledge. Making 260rwkw on stock injectors, stock FPR etc on 1.1 bar

Not sure what to change next. Injectors, Cams, Splitfires come to mind - but I just spent a lot of time having things tuned for economy so I dont really want to touch things for a while.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...