Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First off, I may have put this in the wrong section so feel free to move it. So I am think ing or swapping out my rb20det in my 1991 gts-t and swapping in a rb25det Neo engine, and I just had a few questions that I wanted to clear up before going any further. So thank you very much and I hope to hear from anyone that has any knowledge on the engine.

What is the normal cost of a Neo engine without the tranny?

What should the compression be?

What are common problems with the engine?

Will the Rb20 transmission work with the Neo, if so up to what horsepower?

Any clutch recommendations?

How is the swap? (time/skill)

How is it to wire up?

Will an rb20det PowerFC (AP version) work with the neo? Or should I sell it and buy a rb25 one?

Basically anything that comes to mind about the RB25 Neo

What should the price of this RB20det be?

No transmission

Comp test showed 150 across

Knock reading never over 16

Complete with smic, maf, pod filter, hks actuator set to run 12lbs, stock fuel pump, screamer pipe, mines ecu, and stock clutch (good condition)

you can pm me, reply, or email me at [email protected]

Thanks again for reading this

Edited by Adam J.
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169938-help-with-rb25det-neo/
Share on other sites

I haven't done a swap myself, I know nothing about it.. However I'm driving an R34 GTT and it has the RB25DETT NEO engine... All I'm gonna say is that you've made a good choice... They definitely move along... Nice smooth and grunty engine...

My experience is with a Stagea RB25DET into a R32 GTS4.

The engine drops straight in. The gearbox bolts straight up, and is handling 180kw out through all 4 wheels (estimated 240 at the flywheel). You need to retain your (RB20) P/S pump (for the HICAS).

The NEO is probably similar to the Stagea, in that it has VVT. So, a RB20 PFC will not run it (doesn't know about VVT); best getting a PFC to suit the engine. Get the setup as a half-cut so you get the loom as well to use with your new PFC (you can possibly off-load the gearbox, brakes, etc to recoup some of your cost). A half cut will also give you an ECU, so no need to get the new PFC immediately. No idea on cost; probably 3-4k. Fit at least a HD clutch pressure plate; ceramic clutch and a lightweight flywheel are optional.

It's probably a day each to remove your engine and install the NEO. You will need an engine crane (hireable). There is a lot of "remove <something> to gain access to <some bolt>", so it's fiddly, time-consuming work.

Wiring in - step 1: remove front bar and LH guard. (I'm not kidding!)

As for your current engine, probably not really worth much at all. They are dime-a-dozen from wreckers. You might get 1k if you were really lucky.

Hope that gives you some idea of what's involved. It's certainly worthwhile - the RB25 has torque to burn!

hey thanks for all your replies guys, and ya I hope i can find a buyer for my AP PFC and am able to find an rb25 version. As for turbo i will be running an hks 2535, with some 550cc injectors, and all the other needed supporting mods. thinking of replacing cams as well.

The problem you'll face will be the expense. Neo engines aren't cheap and don't make that much more power than the earlier rb25's. If you're asking questions like 'how to wire it up' etc. I think you'll run into big troubles carrying out this conversion.

You should consider working the rb20det, by the time you add all the costs together for the conversion you could have an rb20 with a reliable 240rwkW+ and still have money money left over to reco the gearbox if needed.

If you get a half-cut, then all you should have to do is swap the loom and ECU over. I treated myself to a new ECU (Wolf 3D 4+), which I had to wire in - that took me a couple of days sorting out which wires I needed to keep, and which wires I could discard.

As they say in the classics ... "CUBIC INCHES COUNT". The RB25DET conversion is well worthwhile. My GTS4 went from 115 at all 4 to 180 at all 4. I doubt you could get that result for the same $$ rebuilding a RB20.

  • 2 weeks later...

So should the compression be around 155-165? i have a guy telling me that his is 140-145 across and saying that's good, but im pretty sure it isnt.

About the PFC, it is extremely hard to come by any kind of PFC being that I live in canada so does anyone think it would be a good idea to sell it on here and then ship it and then buy an rb25 PFC on here and ship it back?

As far as the rb20 bein worth nothing.... up here they seem to be worth a bit. since they arent everywhere i guess

thanks again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...