Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ehe, yes you do have a problem with economy...

If it is hunting at idle (always fluctuating revs) then im sure its your O2 sensor, if I were you though id be more confident with a second opinion from another person on the forums here...

manwhore wats the max latency that the injector cycle should be on consult, I have a greddy intelligent informeter and Im trying ot configure it to show percentage injector duty cycle and then set warning points. i love this thing... lol.

yeah cheers, when cold (anywhere under operating temp) it does hunt at idle. Think ive got an o2 sensor off my old 32 here might give it a try, cheers :woot:

"Hunting" is generally a sign of a gummed up AAC valve. And the O2 sensor is unlikely to be used at idle, or when the engine is not up to operating temp. So, if you only do short trips that don't get the engine up to temp properly, then you are going to chew petrol.

How to test - check the voltage coming off the middle wire of the sensor - it should be oscillating around 0.5V (say 0.3 - 0.7). If it is constantly high (1V) or low 0V) then there is a chance your O2 sensor is cactus.

You might also want to check that the sensor is getting 12V on one of the other 2 wires.

multimeter is the way to check. takes 2 mins.

measure it at idle, give it a rev, and hold it at a sustained rpm, say 2500rpm.

see if you have fluctuating volts

last skyline i checked (a friends) it was dead as a doornail, got no change in volts. replaced it and the car got an extra 50-80km's iirc (hopefully you gain some more!)

also on my skyline i changed spark plugs, cleaned afm and got new coilpacks, that gave me 2L / 100km better economy! my plugs were old though

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...