Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok guys after a few talks with people ive heard the jun 2.7 is a better option than the hks for higher rev reasons ive nailed it down to 2 setup in twins. either stick with the 2871 setup i have or to high mount a set of hks 28/35s and get 700awhp or a single to4z i no the to4z and my current setup will max out around the 600ish awhp make and i just no that i will want more but the twin 2835 setup is double the other 2 setups so if any1 has any ideas or have sum info on there current setups would be much appreciated as i need to decided in 2 days

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/172464-goin-to-build-a-jun-27-stroker/
Share on other sites

Hmmmm, well if your seriously considering that kind of setup, I thought you would be clearer about what your doing especially if its in 2 days >_< That will cost a friggen load of money probably 10k on engine alone easily.

If you want 600 rwkw, just choose a setup for 600 rwkw, If you want 400 rwkw then choose a setup........... and so forth. It depends on what you want to do, race, drag, drift etc. The more power you run, the more money it will chew too

Trent (uras) would be a good guy to give you info since he has built some of the toughest cars in Australia but even he's struggling to understand what your after. This might be a better option if your serious about drag racing:

http://www.carsales.com.au/used-cars/priva...e|1&trecs=1

i made 585rwhp on 18psi and 605rwhp on 22psi with a hks t04z on a jun 2.7L and that was with a pretty ordinary tune, and on pump fuel. id say 640-650rwhp in possible with race fuel and more boost but it was starting to run out of legs i reckon. i find the Z is even too laggy and im going down to a gt35 or so because its a pig on the street and who really needs anymore than 500awhp on the street anyway. revving to 4500rpm+ to get it moving is not fun everytime u wanna get into it. i know people say 4500rpm till fullboost aint laggy but drive a 3L or something with a turbo making 500hp with fullboost at 3200rpm and u will understand.

10k for the engine budget is no where near the money whover stated that

crank rods and pistons $10000

n1 block if u want to make big power $3500

machining is $1000

head porting $2000

cams $1100

retainers and valve springs $1000 roughly

gaskets $350

head and main studs $500

jun oil pump $1200

water pump $300

bearings $300

ati balancer $1000+

clutch $2500+

manifold

turbo/s

wastegate

injectors

ecu

coilpacks

cdi ignition

intercooler

pods

etc etc etc

lets just say around $35000+ easy for all the bits u need

oh i forgot the enlarged baffled sump u will need, twin entry fuel rail, fuel reg, fuel pumps, fuel lines and filters/surge tank, exhuast, valve guides, and all the usual rebuild bits like core plugs, oil seals, timing belt.

dont forget the gearbox to handle the power :)

Hi Danoz,

Im 'nearly' done with my HKS 2.8 build, im using a turbonetics GT-K850 which may have the potential to see 700 at the wheels. They rate it up to 850hp, but its a 0.8 ex housing so i doubt it'd see that on a 2.8, but it should be somewhere in between a T04z and a T51R Kai. If you havent chosen yet you could consider the turbonetics turbo. Im hoping for t04z-like response with more power.

Ill save Sydneykid the time and say that the power level you require is not going to be as good as a lesser powered more responsive setup, on the street or track. However my build is more for shits n giggles :kiss: Id rather the option of swapping down to a smaller more responsive turbo, than feel i have to swap up for more power as i have in the past.

My opinion only , T04Z as I said with the larger T4 flanged twin scroll housing (greater gas flow than T3 flanged TS T4 housing) or possibly preferably a GT4088R and they come with a TS T4 flanged GT40 turbine housing . Will need a really flying manifold and everything else .

A .

ok guys thanks for the info so far its a jun 2.7 with jun head gear with 280 cams all the good stuff like jun pump hks pulleys and so fourth. as for turbo the hks 2835 twin kits is a 2 month wait in a back order from japan im also started to look at twin trust td06-20g-8 or the blitz k3 450r. hhhhmmmm so many options

Hey mate I'm building a r32gtr with a rb30 in her the turbo setup im using first is the twin t67-25g 10mm. I have a dogbox getting built so i hope you have got some money set aside for a good gearbox.Remember nice to have lots of power but its better to have the power getting to the ground not your gearbox hitting the ground.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...