Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On my way to work this morning I heard on the radio that police are now going to be performing more random car stops to defect vehicles. They say its to crack down on "un-roadworthy" vehicles. So where does that leave us, Our vehicles are no where near un-roadworthy most of the time yet police continue to defect imported cars for the most silly things. I found this very annoying, just wanted to know the thoughts you guys have????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173389-defects-on-the-rise/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well fingers crossed they do actually aim at the unroadworthy cars.

Those that are rude as shit and force me to hit the recirc button as their car smokes and stinks like crap; those that run bald tyres, those that have noticable wheel bearing noise, those that have their rear pads metal on metal!!!! :(

Bring in the yearly inspections; similiar to that of otherstates.. Then we can have our local mechanic ensure our cars are up to scratch and also remove defects. At least I think thats how it works interstate?!? :worship:

Agree slightly . Like sambo said though , dont are cars need to be stock to pass an inspection. All this would mean that any of us with mods would be paying for our mechanic's next cruise in europe. LOL .Already done that. LOL.

What they should be targeting is those heap of s%#t cars that are over 25yrs old and full of rust etc .

Imagine having to pull of your exhaust , tint , pfc , rims , air filters etc every year. the bills would be scary $$$.

my ten cents anyway.

Those that are rude as shit and force me to hit the recirc button as their car smokes and stinks like crap; those that run bald tyres, those that have noticable wheel bearing noise, those that have their rear pads metal on metal!!!! :blink:

+1

or spend more time catching the thieves that steal cars

just out of curiosity; Im sure many of you have copped a canary on the windscreen of your Skyline. Including myself.

At one stage, i had 3 fkn stickers on the windscreen at once...

My question IS: What were you originally defected for when pulled over / vehicle randomly inspected? Too Loud? Too Low? Bald Tyres?

The open to atmosphere Blitz Blow off Valve was my serial offender/perpetrator!

Oh, and once bald tyres...

It wasnt until i had to go Regency park where they went over the whole bloody car that they wrote me a nice list of things that needed to be fixed/had to be reverted to stock. (this almost 7 years ago- back in 2000 -we live & learn eh!)...

(All my aftermarket goodies are back on there now however :domokun: )

You could take one look at my 33, and most people would pass it for bog stock; except the diameter of the rear muffler & its tip and the engine note when you hear it drive past. Have tried to keep it as sleepish as possible over the years i've owned it, and the last defect i received was the one for bald tyres in 2001.

i must add though.... i have never copped a random vehicle inspection... all of my defects were obatined due to scallywag behaviour! Being young and stupid behind the wheel was probably a large contributor.

So, what was it that the chops didnt like about your car that made em originally slap ya with a canary???

post-16018-1182306245.jpg

Kralster,

So that you know what we are talking about..........

When we say roadworthy we mean maintained to ensure it drives safely. That being good tyres, good shockers, good bushes, good brakes and doesn't leak oil/water.

Modified for performance; well that has nothing to do with not being roadworthy but everything to do with emissions.

---------

On the note of being defected.... I've been close. I was pulled over for Tint (30% on the front windows) and ripped it off on the spot.

well if a car doesn't meet emisions it is unroadworthy, i'd rather have a few less kilowats and not be releasing as much posionous gas into the atmosphere, if you don't run a cat you deserved to be run over. Unless it's on a race car where you are permited.

roadworthy doesn't just mean is safe and won't be falling apart, it included compliance with ADR's which some people on here's cars do not do. therefore they are unroadworthy.

i looked at this in the paper and almost considered selling my car

i doubt they'll take any of the shit boxes off the road to be honest. it'll just end up us all being picked on for having a safer car than factory

my car wasnt driveable when DA was on at mallala. Took my mum's stock standard 95 model toyota corolla for a cruise out there. Tell ya what, i felt safer in my car in the times ive been out on the drive to mallala previously than i did that one weekend in mum's car. My car gives you road feeling. Doesnt wander around in the grooves, just sits and behaves. Found the corolla wandering all over the road. Yes i know its a smaller car etc, but still arent some of the modifications we do a lot safer than standard?

i know this isnt really the issue, but its crap really. i heard that regency fees have gone up 200 percent too

well if a car doesn't meet emisions it is unroadworthy, i'd rather have a few less kilowats and not be releasing as much posionous gas into the atmosphere, if you don't run a cat you deserved to be run over. Unless it's on a race car where you are permited.

roadworthy doesn't just mean is safe and won't be falling apart, it included compliance with ADR's which some people on here's cars do not do. therefore they are unroadworthy.

having a few less kw doesnt mean it will be running cleaner than a high hp/kw car. Most cars here running big numbers would be actually running better than std with ideal afr numbers putting out less emissions than std. Even std cars with cat converters are useless as they are the same as a muffler that needs changing every few thousand kms to cut the emissions properly.

well if a car doesn't meet emisions it is unroadworthy, i'd rather have a few less kilowats and not be releasing as much posionous gas into the atmosphere, if you don't run a cat you deserved to be run over. Unless it's on a race car where you are permited.

roadworthy doesn't just mean is safe and won't be falling apart, it included compliance with ADR's which some people on here's cars do not do. therefore they are unroadworthy.

bah.... So its worse having a well maintained safe car that brakes well, is able to steer easily around obstacles, doesn't leak oil for you to hit on your catless motor bike that makes a little more power than an old dunga that has no suspension, leaks oil, bald tyres, no brakes etc etc....

You've completely missed the point.... There's so so many damn examples like this on the road and the police simply choose a modified car rather than one that is not maintained.

I'm so so sick of driving behind cars that blow smoke and stink. They need to do something about it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...