Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As many would know...the true K's and the amount showing on the speedo of imports can be two different things! I purchased my s2 stagea with 38.000 on the clock...Although my head tells me this is false, the car has been checked out by a couple of "in the know" mechanics and they say it looks so clean that the low K's may well be correct. The wear on the drivers seat indicates high K's...the clean under body indicate low K's ( and I dont just mean clean looking)...Now to my point.. I am not that fussed about the K's apart from the fact that I know if the timing belt breaks because it has not been changed...it means an expensive repair...I know that in an r33 they was a tamper seal that could tell you if the car had the timing belt changed...and now my real point of the post.....does any one know of any other way to get a true indication of the K's that the car has done, or when the timing belt would need to be changed!

I know its all a bit convoluted but you know what they say about prevention being better than the cure!

cheers.

Scott.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/174118-determining-true-ks/
Share on other sites

If in doubt pull it out - is what i like to say...

For $ 100-130 for a belt and a few hours labour there's no real reason not to if your worried...

no idea how you would get accurate k's on the car... there's to many factors to say yeh it's got xxxk's on it...

i agree, i changed the timing belt on both of my imports. (and fluids and anything else that is consumable).

Don't they do fluids and all filters at compliance? I'm about to get my Stagea 83000kms) and was wondering if it needed the major service (timing belt) done straight away or wait till closer to 100000kms.

Every used car I have owned, I have given a major service as soon as I got it - always factor this into my budget - i cooked an engine 5 days after picking up my second car, and have been paranoid ever since - it pays to cover your rear end - what's a couplke of hundred bucks for a service and new timing belt compared to the hassle and expense of a rebuild/swap?

At compliance they will not touch diff, coolant, power-brake-auto fluid etc. best to get it done yourself with the fluids of your choice. In Japan they dont think long term, maybe 5 years max for their cars. Some things need to be changed immediately.

Also consider that 83000 japanese kms is probably equivalent to 160000 oz kms or more, as most of their driving is 2nd, 3rd gear in traffic.

My Japanese wife recently imported her 97 Pajero GDI owned since new, 48000kms, the diff lsd clutch packs had disintergrated, injectors were gunked up, auto was full of sludge....and i was shocked to find the original mitsubishi oil filter rusted on, she had it serviced every 10k, even the mechanics over their dont think long term. $2000 later it runs like new.

Edited by chook

A noisy tensioner pulley bearing can be a sign it is time to replace if you have nothing else to go on. This will be a rattle coming from the Timing belt area. Replace it for piece of mind though as already mentioned.

A few observations on this subject... I imported a UZZ31 Soarer (with 1UZFE V8) about 3 years ago with 70,000km on the Odo. Since I saw the car prior to compliance I was able to decipher various servicing stickers in the door jam that suggested that there was a possibility that kms were genuine - or at least the car hadn't been 'clocked' in the past 3-4 years. A sticker on the engine said that the cam belt had been replaced at around 67,000km. Regardless of this we recently did a 'major' at 100,000km, which included stripping the cam drive train and replacing water pump, idler bearings etc etc. We discovered that the cam belt was 'as new' which suggested it had indeed been replaced. However, the tensioner had been butchered when this was done, and the attaching bolt was seized in the casting. This required very careful repair. So the moral here is, trust no evidence, and do a major service before anything big lets go. (The Soarer now runs like new!).

Also, watching auctions in Japan over a number of years, it never fails to amaze me how 10+ year old cars can be put to auction with less than 100,000km on the clock. While recently watching to buy an M35 the average number of km for a 2002-2004 model was 50,000km. Clocking speedos is I'm sure widespread in the imports business - there are various dire warnings posted around the auction houses in Japan threatening fines for offering 'clocked' cars. Not sure how effective these are.

Ive got log books. My series 1 was imported at 48,550 into qld by CoolPC, I got it at 78,000. At 80thou I did the timing belt etc etc etc. Was looking worn, didnt have the $$ budgeted to do it all, but better off safe then sorry. If you do it now, you dont have to do it again for another 80-100thou kms.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...