Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

it can be done, you will need wider guards not just lipped, and a low offset wheel to clear. i just finished fitting up 19x10 all round on a gtt, 19offset with aftermarket guards, sits flush.

youll need a big tyre for 10", which on the front of a 4 door will make a fair difference when driving.

20x8.5front/20x10rear is btter suited in my opinion, unless you've already got the guards then go for it.

al

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175415-20-x-10s/#findComment-3220674
Share on other sites

20s is a big step from 19s believe it or not

you cant fit wide 20s and lower the car to a decent height with stock guards

you need wider guards or a shortened rear diff/suspension set up and big tubs

i can fit 19x10 all round on my car and it will look ok height wise

but anything wider than 20x8 and unless it sits like a land cruiser it wont fit

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175415-20-x-10s/#findComment-3220834
Share on other sites

how so?

20s on my car was the same as 18s ride and handling wise

I've got 20s and my car isn't a useless trophy, its a car i take out almost every weekend, my wife and kids love going out in it

not everyone is at home on a race track with vinyl graphics and massive GT wings from NASA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175415-20-x-10s/#findComment-3224549
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Unsprung Weight.

20 inch wheels are not your friend.

If the only reason to put this size wheel is for looks, you need to decide if this one 'pro' is worth the many 'cons' of a big heavy wheel.

Nice japanese light weight 17 or 18" Work, Volk etc wheels look 10 times better than ANY 20", full stop. Plus you get the extra respect and kudos. :laugh:

My two cents.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175415-20-x-10s/#findComment-3256446
Share on other sites

I Can understand how it looks good on a 4 door but I dont understand why you would want 10" on the car all round? Id go 8.5 front (the steering would be shithouse with anything higher still takes me forever to spin the car) and 9.5 rears .. no chance you could fit 10" on the back from how much clearence I had :S

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175415-20-x-10s/#findComment-3258209
Share on other sites

Ive got 20x8.5 all round with 255/30 at the rear (which ends up being a touch under 10 inch), its slammed pretty hard with only lipped guards and doesnt rub at all at the rear, although does a occasionaly at the front when you are doing a u-turn.

Theres even room for 265s had I been available at the time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175415-20-x-10s/#findComment-3258904
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...