Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have for sale a set of Tomei Poncams for series 2 R33.

BRAND NEW IN BOX!

1X Intake

1X Exhaust

256 degree cam.

No valve springs needed.

They are for series 2 R33 built from Sep 97 part.

Part number is 143050.

Asking $700 delivered FIRM!

Or swap for series 1 Poncams part number 143020(must be new)

PM if interested

CHEERS

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175669-fs-tomei-poncams-rb25det-series-2/
Share on other sites

Sounds like they will fit my RB25 NEO! Would I be right?

I dont think they fit NEO engines.Tomei have a different part number on their website.But the best way to find out would be to take your car to your tuner and get them to tell you what part number and cams would suit your car. :D

Does anyone know what effect the CAMS have on fuel economy?

Speaking generally..

Mild Road Cam 257deg-260deg. Gives low end improvements and used in unmodified engines suitable for all car types and gives a smooth tickover. Fuel economy may actually improve and power and responsiveness will be greater.

Fast Road cam 270deg-285deg. Good compromise for a road car the tick over is still fairly smooth and emissions are within legal limits. A good choice for a car used daily and for weekend track use and perfect for a hot hatch. This profile still gives reasonable fuel economy and a choppy tickover.

Competition cams 290deg-320deg. The best performance profile for an engine which works continually over 3000 revs. The tickover is very lumpy and irregular and the car is lumpy to drive round town. Fuel economy is pathetic and it is unlikely that a car with this fitted will pass any kind of emissions test.

Edited by Shift_Lock

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...