Jump to content
SAU Community

Kilometers


Shaunc
 Share

Recommended Posts

'95 S1.5 r33 gts-t with 126,000kms. Haven't had any troubles with it apart from a dudd battery. I'll be selling it in a year or two and getting a supra anyway so the mileage doesn't bother me. Way I see it, a higher odometer is probably closer to the truth than a lower one. They are getting pretty old now aswell so I'd be surprised if most weren't around the 100 mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1995 R33 Gts-t - bought with 90 000km 4 years ago and now its done 210 000km. Only problems I have had with it are the usual wear and tear type things - but I am sure things will start falling apart soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1995 R33 Gts-t - bought with 90 000km 4 years ago and now its done 210 000km. Only problems I have had with it are the usual wear and tear type things - but I am sure things will start falling apart soon.

I guess it goes to show that if you look after it with regular maintenance etc they can go for many years!

Series2 33 GTST. Bought May 06 @ 63000km. Now has 93000 on it running higher boost etc... No problems as yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now here's a car with nice low genuine kilometres

http://page5.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/e63812200

I love google translation tools!

Relationship of the system of course the condition of interior and the wrapping is good very, also travelling actual travelling 58000KM the male is completed is your degree preeminent car very little without either the sash and the colour fade-out etc of the body surface.

Of course there is no restoration calendar! You can say that it is the genuine best car 輌 by the actual travelling car.

Furthermore because the additional photograph is attached finely, when reference it receives please and question and the like is communication we wait to description below without modesty.

Furthermore, please request preliminary inspection and test drive etc without propriety modesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rofl @ the google translation!

'90 R32 GTSt purchased privately in Sept '06 with a supposed 99,***km (yeah right), now at about 115,***km.

Hasn't missed a beat, had to replace the front left stub axle when I got it as the previous owner put it over a kerb and had a few dramas with the breathing setup which the last owner fubar'd, ran 14psi through the RB20 turbo for 6months then put the RB25 turbo on. Only other minor drama I had was an exhaust leak from between the turbo/manifold. Had it dyno'd on the weekend and it made 195rwhp @ 5300rpm and about 12psi but they shut it down early as it was running a bit lean.. time to get that 044 in! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What are the torque specs for those 6 bolts on the retainer plate and 4 oil pan bolts? I'm currently tackling this job during an auto to manual conversion... I thought this would a 5 minute job! 
    • Tryna decide if I should get a skirt coating on my cp 2618 forged pistons that im about to order. Anyone have first hand experience with a forged RB with coated or non coated piston skirts? Is it worth it and does it make much difference? And for people who went with 2618 pistons with no skirt coating how long has your engine lasted? The engine is an rb25/30 and main concern is  that It will be a daily car and will probably see a fair bit of short distance driving, have been told by my machine shop and my tuner that generally a forged engine lasts around 40,000kms before needing a rebuild. Would a skirt coating make much of a difference? cheers 
    • From now on read it as minus 5 and minus 7 instead of dash, and you're correct...
    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
×
×
  • Create New...