Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all,

im setting my 33 up for drifting, and in turn am looking to upgrade the turbo for a power gain, but more looking for a response improvement, with minimal lag.

mods coming are upgraded fuel pump & pressure regulator, 550cc injectors, power fc

another 33 ive seen set up for drift had a HKS 2540? however after reading a thread on this i was put off this particular turbo because of lag. should i look to go down the path of a high flow? or proceed to purchase a direct bolt on replacement? and if so, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

i have searched, but most of the threads have applications that are for hp gains and top end power, not so much response

cheers

Edited by riceracer
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/178640-turbo-upgrade-for-drifting/
Share on other sites

T67 8cm, over 213rwkw from 3300 and peaks at 270rwkw all @ 17psi. See the yellow R34 i put the kit together for, he competed in Super drift D at oran park. The thing is too responsive! It had a gt30 on it B4 and was a pig.

try drifting with a standard turbo first.. get your skill then go big.. im running a 35/40 .63 for drift with around 18 or so psi hoping for roughly 270 - 290rwkw, i dont want to go over 290kw for drifting, its just stupidly overpowered.

OR

As trent said, the t67, also the TD06 25G L2 will be a killer turbo for drift..

Trent how did robs 32 drift car go with the td06 on it?

try drifting with a standard turbo first.. get your skill then go big.. im running a 35/40 .63 for drift with around 18 or so psi hoping for roughly 270 - 290rwkw, i dont want to go over 290kw for drifting, its just stupidly overpowered.

OR

As trent said, the t67, also the TD06 25G L2 will be a killer turbo for drift..

Trent how did robs 32 drift car go with the td06 on it?

it had a 14cm rear housing and was geared well with the OS close ratio box, it was built for Grip but i liked it for drift.... even though you needed to be a rough kent... full boost by 5000 and pulled to 8800 rev limit :thumbsup:

the T67 on the R34 made 40rwkw more between 3000-4500 and at least 10 everywhere else but peaked at the same top power as the GT30 so i know which one i would rather be drifting >_<

cant u sacrifice poor suspension setup and crap tyres to induce loss of traction rather than throwing more power at the rear wheels ?

for a moderator thats uncalled for. If you have a problem with drift theres no need to post in threads about it.

how was that response as a moderator uncalled for?

so because im a moderator i cant have an idea or view on something?

i was just thinking out aloud, there a more than one way to skin a cat and drifting that ive seen requires lots of wheelspin

so one way to induce wheelspin is power, but there are other ways to get wheelspin, suspension, tyres, diff setup etc

and i dont get the cool off comments? it was a suggestion/idea relax....

i dont have a problem with drifting and my response was a serious one

how was that response as a moderator uncalled for?

so because im a moderator i cant have an idea or view on something?

i was just thinking out aloud, there a more than one way to skin a cat and drifting that ive seen requires lots of wheelspin

so one way to induce wheelspin is power, but there are other ways to get wheelspin, suspension, tyres, diff setup etc

and i dont get the cool off comments? it was a suggestion/idea relax....

i dont have a problem with drifting and my response was a serious one

apologies mate, i took it the wrong way, thanks for ur input

how was that response as a moderator uncalled for?

so because im a moderator i cant have an idea or view on something?

i was just thinking out aloud, there a more than one way to skin a cat and drifting that ive seen requires lots of wheelspin

so one way to induce wheelspin is power, but there are other ways to get wheelspin, suspension, tyres, diff setup etc

and i dont get the cool off comments? it was a suggestion/idea relax....

i dont have a problem with drifting and my response was a serious one

well then the answer to your question , no not really, that would be like putting smaller brakes on your car to save weight while racing ;) (on a track)

I'm not sure if you guys are familiar with turbonetics turbo chargers, but their T3/T4 hybrid ball bearing turbo is quite effective in pushing 290Kw with ease and give massive response. a friend of mine has a 26 with that turbo in his car, and i can tell you the car is violent. it hits full boost around 3300 and pulls massive to 8500 limiter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...