Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

New article in smh

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/street...6252518932.html

ffs these ppl dont ever learn, better to keep it on the low cos coppers r cracking down on hoons... you will just copped it up the ass if ur caught. Also i think they r proposing to crush the confiscated cars now =/<br /><br /><br />

[QOUTE] He said more extreme measures might be needed to stamp out illegal street racing.

You have to question whether, as in the case of the United States, the solution to this problem is in part the compacting of vehicles into a cube dropped on the front lawn of their homes,'' Mr Moroney told reporters today.Maybe that's the message that they've got to understand [/QOUTE]

Edited by gwaping2k
  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ur right there duncan.

i dont beleive that the media want to let the message across to people that the track is where its at if there is to be any real order for racing on the street.

i particularly dont like the implication that street racing is coming from people who go to the drags.

It is getting hard to live in west. I have been for awhile now pff my P's but guys....my skyline is not coming out for another 2-3 weeks...hehehehe

When we stop speeding we get pulled over anyway for owing a Skyline, even is no skylines involved in this crazy.....race!!!!!

I realy feel sorry for the couple which died but why we are involved in all this????

EUG.

Hahah yeah I got a new haircut... :thumbsup: (no its not me :) )

My brother & his wife lives at St Marys so looks I'll be taking the r31 grandpa spec out there and put my golf hat on rear parcel shelf...actually, i'll prob get defected for obstructing my vision

I agree with both Duncan and Trust33. Instead of advertising the fact that there is a legal place to drag race, what do the police do? Crackdown on those cars that are attending the sole place that will get the street racers off public roads. It's absolutely ridiculous. But then again, they are just implementing their typical knee-jerk reaction in order for the public to believe that they are actually doing something positive. The only positive thing here is that many of those who are supporting the legal form or drag racing won't be returning. Guess where they will be?

The police should have been at the many well known illegal street racing spots that are all over Sydney. They know where they are, but that would mean that they actually did something right for once.

Idiots.

Oh, and why the hell would they have undercover officers inside WSID? Again, that will do nothing but facilitate the widing of the gap between police and driver relations.

Clowns.

well....squashing a car into a cube is no worse than keeping the car in a police impound where everything like stereo/wheels etc will be stolen off it and insurance won't cover it.

Bottom line is - cheif of police sai he doesn't understand what it will take to get through to hoons. Clearly true because he is alientating the people whose attitude he is trying to change

Oh, and why the hell would they have undercover officers inside WSID? Again, that will do nothing but facilitate the widing of the gap between police and driver relations.

Clowns.

undercover officers to do what?get a look at the cars that are racing legaly.then burn them for driving it home after an event.

its downright bloody rude.

hang on.lets start getting the people walking home drunk because they are in a no alcohol zone.compareably the same shit.

it doesnt take a genious to see that they are being assholes.and that they should really be out targeting the real criminals.killers,rapists,assaultists and drug dealers.

i think they were only after people speeding, not defecting anyone. be realistic, not everyone who goes to WSID is a car enthusiast and only gives it a hit on the track. alot of those who get done are spectators who are hyped from watching it all night, not just the competitors.

it wasnt a shit go, if you were speeding that night you got caught. move on?

If anyone was doing anything wrongn going to and from WSID or wherever else, then they must cop it sweet. that is probably the only part of the police blitz that I cannot and will not be against. This is a given no matter where you are on public roads. How many of these cars were done for illegal street racing? None. It was a blatant crackdown that was designed to make the police appear to be doing something proactive in the eyes of the public, where in effect, all they were doing was making those who were supporting legal off-street racing think twice about attending future WSID events for fear of being defected or worse. I don't agree with the undercover police being at WSID unless they have a serious motive/suspicion of illegal activity. If the purpose of this blitz was to target potential street racers, then they should be out at the many well known street racing spots with the aim of pushing these racers into going to WSID. Instead they are doing the opposite.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...