Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This weekend im planning on installing my highflowed turbo with 0P6 rear housing.

While inspecting the turbo and all the fittings that came with it,i noticed that the water banjos that were supplied looked to be 19mm.

These fit into the new Garrett cartridge.

The stock ones to my understanding are 24mm.

So how am i going to get the 24mm banjo head to fit around the 17mm banjo bolt for the new cartridge?

Also the new banjo heads have a barb like thread (like t-pieces for vacuum lines)

Has anyone come across this before?

The turbo was highflowed by Precision turbos.

how am i going to get the 24mm banjo head to fit around the 17mm banjo bolt for the new cartridge?

Also the new banjo heads have a barb like thread (like t-pieces for vacuum lines)

Has anyone come across this before?

You need the services of a hose specialist. Enzed, Pirtek or whoever suits you best.

If you've used a Garrett cartridge into stock housings this is fairly normal. The OE fittings do not fit the Garrett cartridge, and you basically have to get them to do a little work to make it all come together. No big job actually, and something they can (and should) come and do on-site.

There are some threads with photos available. Search under my name, and from memory Ol Mate also posted something regarding adapting oil/water lines in the past month, when there was a query about what people believed constituted a "bolt on" turbo upgrade.

And yes, there are fittings that have barbed ends. I have a set still sitting in my shed that were not used, in preference to banjos that took braided line.

cheers

OK after a hard day of thinking and calling a few places this is what ive come up with.

The Garrett ball bearing cartridge has different banjo sizes to the stock cartridge,so ill either need to get braided lines made to fit the new size banjo(expensive) or cut the stock banjo off the water lines (turbo end) and get a length of braided hose to clamp to the lines then clamp to the new banjo.Will work,but a little dodgey.This will also save me taking the lines off themselves.

Ive managed to get another set of lines off a friend (oil and water) should i get pirtek to modify the lines by fitting the new banjo on?

They would have to make sure they get new angle of the new banjo facing the exact way otherwise it wont go on to the turbo properly.

Also which water line is which:

1) this water line has two banjos on it?

2) this water line has one banjo on it?

Im assuming the water line with one banjo in the water feed??

OK i have the turbo off the car (fun 3-4hrs)

I went to pirtek and got some braided lines made to suit the factory lines.

The new banjo bolt for the stock oil inlet line is.5mm smaller than stock,i think ill get away with keeping the oil inlet line as is,the washers should prevent any leaks fingers crossed.

Oh and i managed to snap the top 2 exhaust flange bolts grrrrr luckily im not using that turbo anymore.Apart from the running around getting some new bolts and a couple of spanners its going ok(for now).

The hard part will be removing the water line that runs around the back of the block.

If anyone can give me some advice in removing it will be appreciated.

From what i can see ill need to remove the coil cover and get my hand down there.But i think putting the new line on will be a PAIN.

Have you incorporated an oil restrictor in to the braided line?

If you take note of the std setup Nissan have used a restrictor at the block fitting and a restrictor at the turbo.

The new garrett turbo's have the restrictor built in to the turbo however you are still required to fit another restrictor upstream.

When I fitted my turbo I had pirtek use the existing banjo's that fit to the block and solder new bundy tube to it. And was cheap as chips. ~$45 per line so $135 for all 3 lines. Cheap as chips and factory like. :D

You could have saved yourself a lot of running around by getting a mobile unit to come on-site. Best of all they will get the length and set of the lines correct. The risk of having the custom lines chafing or cracking from stress or vibration

Leave the steel water line in place. Have it cut somewhere around where it emerges on the LHS rear of the head/block, and get the hose man to attach a fitting to it. Then have him make up a suitable line that marries up to the fitting and takes a banjo to fit onto the cartridge.

A simple search could have revealed pics of the very job you want to do. That water line is virtually impossible to otherwise get to, and best accessed either when the engine is out of the car, or gearbox out to change a clutch.

The hard part will be removing the water line that runs around the back of the block.

If anyone can give me some advice in removing it will be appreciated.

From what i can see ill need to remove the coil cover and get my hand down there.But i think putting the new line on will be a PAIN.

OK guys, i got to the water line by removing the LHS rocker cover,it was right there.Pulled it off and attached my new line.

Bolted everything back together last night,filled her up will oil and coolant and gave her a few kicks over to get some oil around the motor.

I started it let it run for a few mins then incounted an oil leak(oil inlet to turbo).As it was 1am i deceided to leave it till the morning.

OK this morning i went out and bought a 15mm socket and 3/8 ball joiner and tightened up the banjo bolt as much as room would allow.

Started it up and the oil leak was fixed.As usual alot of smoke was coming from oil covered parts as the motor and turbo warmed up.

After 10 mins idling the smoke was gone but the PFC was recording a 94 deg in the motor so shut it off.

Probably didnt let the coolant flow through the motor long enough before i put the radiator cap on.

Keep you posted,

OK guys i bled the cooling system properly and temps are 78-80 as normal.

Took the car for a little drive around the block and the new turbo sounds awesome.

Laggier that stock thats for sure.Didnt want to boost it or rev it too hard before i get the tune done,so all and all it went ok.

Good to hear dave. Watch that coolant mate. What I normally do when bleeding it, is with the car off, I jack the front right up, and keep filling it until it comes out of the bleed nipple.

Keep the level in the overflow correct, and after a drive, it'll suck more water in, if there's a little bit of air.

Some people like to do it with the car on, but I don't like it - it makes a mess.

Ive been driving around with this new turbo for a few days now and ive just been babying it around not really boosting it over 2psi.

I wanted to make sure my boost controller was working properly so i gave the accel a half throttle stab just to bring the boost up to 8psi(set boost) but it shot up to 10.4psi(would have gone way more if i had not let off)

So i turned the boost controller off and gave the accel another half throttle stab and still the boost shot up past the waste gate spring set boost level and still would have went more if i had not let off the gas.

Im pretty sure all my vacuum lines are set back to the way they were before the turbo install.

But i was thinking if the new (old) actuator had a higher spring in it would the boost controller not be able to control the boost until it hit this level??

Im pretty sure all my vacuum lines are set back to the way they were before the turbo install.

But i was thinking if the new (old) actuator had a higher spring in it would the boost controller not be able to control the boost until it hit this level??

Answered my question with the search button.If the actuator spring is set for one bar,the boost controller wont control it till it hits one bar.

Meaning i cant select a lower boost setting than one bar.

i guess ill have to find out if this actuator has been modified.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...