Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well 370rwkw - pretty much your usual RB26 build.

R33 GTR crank (or 32 with collar)

Stock rods with decent rod bolts

Forged Pistons

Usual pretting/maching and so on

HKS2530 or similar

Bit of a head tidy up

Injectors

AFMs

ECU

Exhaust/Dumps

Clutch/gearbox (if you dont already have)

Probably freshen the diff

Suspension/brake upgrages

Replace all hoses around the motor etc etc.

Your easily looking at 30k spending, if not more.

Plenty of info on ~370rwkw RB26's lots of em around.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185101-500hp-atw-rb26/#findComment-3350782
Share on other sites

The usual forged bottom end; no real need for major head mods - just a clean up when you fit Tomei poncams; T04Z or GTSS or GTRS's; power fc, 700cc+ injectors,bigger fuel pump; oil mods won't hurt and also a decent oil pump like JUN, HKS, Trust etc

There will be other requirements, but these are the basics.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185101-500hp-atw-rb26/#findComment-3351066
Share on other sites

You don't really need twin highmounts to achieve the power you are after, unless you just want them for the sake of having them. My twin 2835's made a lazy 411rwkw on 1.1 bar, but the abovementioned turbos in previous posts can easily make the power you need, which is plenty for a street RWD car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185101-500hp-atw-rb26/#findComment-3354965
Share on other sites

ye, i too would advise against high-mount.

While it looks good (depending on turbo choice), its not as functional when there is a wide range of products out there that easily fit your goal, and use the stock gear tahts tried and proven.

Highmounts just means massive cost, for no better gain. And well... 2530's really arent that impressive (size wise), so high mounted from the looks, they would be so-so

Are you after the show aspect here mainly?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185101-500hp-atw-rb26/#findComment-3354981
Share on other sites

R33 box will take 370rwkw no problem.

Main reason for that is you wont have any traction no matter what you do :ninja:

You'll be fine IMO in RWD with a R33 box. I raced mine with 370rwkw 3-4 big days (20+ runs each time) and cant say i noticed any issues... but then i didnt have one iota of traction :mellow:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185101-500hp-atw-rb26/#findComment-3355614
Share on other sites

twin high mounts would be a massive waste as the turbs would be fairly decent sized (unless u had plans to build an 800+rwhp car), and for street ur mums camry would flog the shit out of u, have no boost till 6k lol... i have seen a guy get custom manifolds made up for smaller gt2870's or something rather to mount them high, (HPI magazine) although it looked funny as they arent that big in terms of size...

id personally go twin 2530's low mount save money on manifolds and have a crazy response set up

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185101-500hp-atw-rb26/#findComment-3360139
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The speedo's can be very conservative, when my Mazda NC MX5 speedo is showing 118kph, the GPS, and a calibrated radar.... cop mate.....hits me at around 110kph +/- 1 or 2 kph, and that is on a 215/45 17, stock tyres size is 205/45 17 as well, so weirdly conservative with stock tyre size When my Commodore speedo red 116kph GPS had me at 110kph After doing some offset and clearance measurements to see what can fit the NC on 17x8 +40, without guard rolling or rubbing anything at my current ride height, I've decided that when my tyres are toast, I'm going to fit 225/45 17 and see where that gets me IRT actual speed of my speedo and GPS/radar From the online calculator I should be still be doing around 5kph under an actual 110kph when the speedo is showing 110kph My ADHD requires that when I'm doing 110kph on the speedo, that the actual road speed is actually really close to that, and not alot slower And going from 205 to 225 still keeps the car within the %/mm allowable in the NSW vehicle rules and regulations, which is nice, as long as I'm looking at the latest version that is.....LOL https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-13.464-Light-vehicle-modifications-Vehicle-Standards-Information-No-6-November-2013.pdf
    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
×
×
  • Create New...