Jump to content
SAU Community

Vn 3.8 Stroked To A 4.0 Engine In My 32r


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

this really makes me sick, i pray that he is just joking because if he gets rid of the best engine ever made for a v6... seriously a V6!!. he does not deserve a r32 is he aiming to drive slower and make his car sound bad. Now im not making fun of him starting right... now. ok now ill talk about that engine easily it sucks but thats my opinion so dont get angry with me, there are way to many of these cars around where i live and they put exhaust systems on them and they all sound horrible they dont sound sporty or sound like there fast they just sound like there is something wrong with there engine or there isnt any exhaust on the car. anyway i could make fun of holden for ages there just a car that im not a fan of at all, and thats mainly because of the drivers that have them where i live, they are all wankers starting fights and doing massive burnouts outside pubs all the time so i dont have anytime for them there all show ponies, but im not saying that every holden driver is just where i live.

To fix the sound when you put the clutch in, make sure to fill the box with Charcoal and sawdust, use diesel oil in the engine for maximum response.

even better

use kero for engine oil but before you close the oil cap chuck a burning match in it so your engine is always warm and ready to fang from the word go

but the charcoal and sawdust works a treat on the gearbox. maybe add a little paint in it also with clear coat to make it all pretty

so ye

COOL

:laugh: put a VN motor in your GTR and skyline owners will rape your ass till your convert it back

Edited by ashneel

i love the idea but i think i might do it differently thinking of buying a gtr shell and putting in a suzi cappachino 0.8lt motor in it and bolting it up the the 4wd, then raise it up with some 1980's landcruiser suspention wheels and some blocks, i think it would be a mad as car

ahahaha. Baad. My mates walking around at the shop explaining it to me, im like wtf. YOu cant be serious. And my other mate is pissin himself. Jumped on the laptop, right in front of me sayin WaTiSLuV ........

wtf. Cant get over it ahahha

if ur gona put a turbo on it too then do it those stroker motors are better than buick crap they are stronger and rock solid make sure you go for the c.o.m.e. racing 4.2L stroker boost motor designed for boost applications and there is a twin throttle designed for it too put the turbo on with it will hammer.

yeh true, but if u got a good compression ratio it should eliminate that probly fairly well

and the 4.2 will have plenty of torque. otherwise i wouldnt go for a 4.2 standard on itself n/a no turbo. if it were me id leave the rb25 in there and run the turbo off the 6 cylinders

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...