Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i got fined the other nite for having my number plate on the LHS of the car (33gtst) $240 dollars later i called the transport department and they said that the plate can be anywhere on the front of the car as long as it is viewable from a 45' angle??? is there anyway of getting out of this redulious fine without going to court??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185493-help/
Share on other sites

no it is better going to court buddy, just provide documented evidence from the transport company that states that you are allowed to have your plate there. Provide evidence from mitsubishi about the late model evo which has it there....chances are if you provide this evidence..you may not need it, but the judge my look at it and WTF are you wasting my time with this and throw it out.

Best going to court buddy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185493-help/#findComment-3356201
Share on other sites

You need to take a very scientific approach to beating this fine...

Park your car at a shopping centre right on the white line under the middle of the car, then measure a 45 degre angle from the front of the car in both directions.

Be very accurate, mark the 45 degre line with chalk on the concrete, make sure you take photos of you doing the measuring and the marking.

Then stand back 20 metres or so and take a photo of the front of your car with your camera from both lines.

If you can see the number plate easily in both photos you will win the case easily, if you cannot see it in one of the photos then dont bother going to court, just pay the fine.

Does this make any sence?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185493-help/#findComment-3356274
Share on other sites

Dude was it a state traffic task force officer that fined you? or a normal copper? i had a defect that i thought was stupid/irrelevant/bullshit and i wrote in to the officer in charge @ STTF with all my evidence and everything and he wrote back saying no action was required on my behalf and he would look into it further and get back to me, its now 3 months or so later and i havent heard back from him but i'm sure when/if i hear back he will favour my way, you should do the same

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185493-help/#findComment-3357743
Share on other sites

The ONLY way things like this will stop happening is for everyone who cops a bullshit fine/harassment etc to go thru the inconvenience of taking it thru court, turn up well armed & have the facts give the beak no option but to throw it out.

Only then will some sort of precedent be set & hopefully the cowboys within the service will be finally told to back the f**k off & leave us alone when it comes to this sort of petty crap.

There is no doubt that police have their place in the world, but sometimes some of them need to be reminded exactly where that place is........

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185493-help/#findComment-3358375
Share on other sites

I really don't see how you can get done for having your plate offset to one side, if it is veiwable under their rules, then its legal.

I work on Alfa Romeo's, with the design of their front ends the factory mounting position for the number plate is offset on the left hand side of the vehicle, there was something back in 98 when the 156 was first released here that they had to change some rule allowing this, not 100% sure on what state of what the rule was, but still we have never had any customer complain of being fined for an offset number plate.

Find out the rules and if you are sweet under then take it futher.

Good luck

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185493-help/#findComment-3358501
Share on other sites

i went and saw a transport department officer about it yesterady...he said good luck and told me to try and put it in the middle...f*@kin F#&K F*&Ks...looks like i just gotta pay because of being a minority.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/185493-help/#findComment-3359443
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...