Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just about to purchase my 1st set of Rays and was calculating sizes and offsets with a buddy from Musecret.

we calculated for the rears there would be a total for 127mm of dish and the fronts 87mm. with offsets of +15 and + 8 respectively

he also mentioned they were type B (something to do with the amount of dish and break clearance)

he also mentioned that having smaller offsets puts more strain on the car and results in lower handling, performance ect ect

was quite surprised but some how it makes sense.

was wondering if anyone could shed some light on the topic.

oh also do u guys rkn the dish is to much?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/188265-offsett-affect-performance/
Share on other sites

Type A, B, etc mainly refers to the face of the wheel and sometimes spoke curvature/dish, where certain types are designed to clear big brakes, while others arent.

A lower offset putting more strain on the car doesnt make any sense. Perhaps more strain on the wheel itself if the offset is something mad like -20.

The way I see it, the only way a lower offset can affect performance is that the wheels sit further outwards, giving the car a wider base, making it more stable, sorta.

On a side note, for those offsets you're gonna need guard work or some massive camber.

Edited by Yawn
A lower offset putting more strain on the car doesnt make any sense. Perhaps more strain on the wheel itself if the offset is something mad like -20.

The way I see it, the only way a lower offset can affect performance is that the wheels sit further outwards, giving the car a wider base, making it more stable, sorta.

not true. basically the further out from the hub the wheel centreline is the more strain is put on the hubs, suspension and most of all the wheel bearings.

I agree with BB, lower offset, means widening the track width = changing the center of gravity of your car and hence putting additional strain on suspension parts eg bushes etc....

That said, there is an optimal range of offsets which will be bugger all impact on the above...+8 might be pushing it or anything with a -ve offset...

not true. basically the further out from the hub the wheel centreline is the more strain is put on the hubs, suspension and most of all the wheel bearings.

True, makes sense :)

Is it a noticeable strain though? Like handling affected, suspension components failing more frequently, etc.? Or more of a theoretical strain?

Edited by Yawn
not true. basically the further out from the hub the wheel centreline is the more strain is put on the hubs, suspension and most of all the wheel bearings.

thats what i was worried about......with those specs do u think i would be risking serious damage or anything? i have plans of 300+rwkw.....so im a little worried about low offsets doing some dmg

How wide are these wheels with the +15 and +8 offsets?

19x11 on the rears and 19x9 on the fronts

True, makes sense :)

Is it a noticeable strain though? Like handling affected, suspension components failing more frequently, etc.? Or more of a theoretical strain?

would like to know this aswell. im getting a suspension kit from sydneykid to better the handling.....i hope having these wheels wont make it worse off

Edited by R34NRG

most notable stress would be on wheel bearings IMO. bigger offset = wider track. wider track means the car *should* be more stable through corners, cant really see any drawbacks in relation to handling, unless your alignment is thrown out by something

well basically the further out you go the bigger the problem. if you started with your stock 17X7 +38s or whatever they are. and you go to 19X11 +20 off the top of my head that's about 65mm further out. plus they are much heavier (even if the rims are lightweight there is no such thing as a light weight 19inch tyre) so yeah it will be putting more strain on suspension and bearings. but a wheel in that size is all about looks anyway as they would be useless from a performance point of view so I wouldn't worry about it too much. probably the only consequence you will find is that you flog out wheel bearings much faster than normal.

thats what i was worried about......with those specs do u think i would be risking serious damage or anything? i have plans of 300+rwkw.....so im a little worried about low offsets doing some dmg

you'll crash it anyway so what's the point?

also you should note that changing your track can make you car illegal. in VIC, you can only widen the rear track on an independant rear suspension car by 25mm (front is also 25mm), so that is 12.5mm per wheel. so that means you can only change the offset of the wheel by 12.5mm.

also having a wider rear track than front track can make the car a bit more unstable going into corners under brakes, and slightly easier to roll. having a wider rear track makes the dynamics a bit more like a trike.

also you should note that changing your track can make you car illegal. in VIC, you can only widen the rear track on an independant rear suspension car by 25mm (front is also 25mm), so that is 12.5mm per wheel. so that means you can only change the offset of the wheel by 12.5mm.

That's f**kin gay. I always thought it was 25mm on EACH side, but it's all together. Everything's f**kin illegal.

Would those wheels rub against your coilovers? They're pretty wide wheels on such a high-ish offset.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...