Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its no pike peak but looks good fun :P

skip 1 min in the footage at the start dont work right.

that is the actual 1 he bought, never been thrashed :( silly boy didnt wanna go through the hassles of buying off someone who dont speak english but surely coulda found a nicer condition 1

yeah cultus is a upper model 4wd we didnt get they go pretty damn good for a 1.3 but still nothing ground breaking ive heard there is a turb but this 1 isnt boosted. gti our local better model makes something like 65 70kw at fronts lil bit quicker than a vp v6 actually better comparo for you guys is its as quick as the old 88 skyline auto seen 2 races between em 1 vl (same diff) and 1 88skyline both dead even with the bog stockers

and the cino's ive killed many with my old dato

there's an orange cino getting around with some crazy kit on it pretending its a gti :( feel free to beat it in your dailys or your push bike people

if you on a crazy crap budget n need to save on fuel gti's arnt too shaby idea (flogging it still gets you 17k's per litre) but if you plan on modding your way to something powerful go a different route for god sake it'll end it tears n any fuel money saved will be spent on repairs.

i grew up with the old swift club so i picked up a fair bit on em :P i was always after a 32 gtr though

Edited by Inline 6

lol im far from good at maths and i got it.got any more brain busters there for me steve haha.hmm im currently sitting on a quater tank and have driven 334kms....and its NA :P ....i sure hope i can suck another 70kms out of it!

I used to get no less 500 kays out of my chasers tank, I think they're about 60L from memory. Once I got 670, and still wasn't on the fuel light :(

The skyline hasn't seen a proper full tank yet, and even then the speedo and odo don't work so I owuldn't be able to measure consumption anyway :P

seems like when the intercooler is cold it goes good but once it warms its gets a little laggy

might need bigger cooler or larger piping and not steel pipe work

Or you need a retune for your motor :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...