Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Awesome game. Don't forget to turn up the sound! Post you high scores here.

Mine is 30 seconds

http://www.fugly.com/media/view.php?cat=DOWNLOADS&id=709

Category= Tastless Haha I havent seen that before

Access to this web page is restricted.

Category:

Tasteless Reason:

BLOCK_WEBCAT-DefaultGroup URL:

www.fugly.com/media/view.php?cat=DOWNLOADS

The department's Internet Usage and Monitoring policies identify that the access or use of internet services for prohibited or obscene purposes, or in support of such activities, is to considered to be inappropriate and unacceptable. Further, the department monitors usage of the internet and provides reports to Business Unit Directors relating to inappropriate use.

If you believe that access to this page has been inappropriately restricted, please contact the Shared Servies Service Desk on (08) 8226 5654.

was meant to go to Shane's place to watch it but couldn't make it as i have a cold and didn't want infect everyone.

hopefully will be able to watch it this coming monday at his place!!!

Its only early... had my first scan today... Nearly 9 weeks along. We'd been trying for a year to get pregnant. Ben is so happy. I saw its little heart beating... and tiny little legs starting to grow :D

We are gonna find out if its a boy or girl... ben isn't patient enough to wait!

So that would make you around 17 weeks then???

WOW congrats Nene and Ben!!!!

My brother-in-law's wife (he is Red Back on SAU and owns the grey R33GTR number plate VPSEC-3) had her 4th child this morning - a 4th GIRL believe it or not! Going to visit them tonight at Calvary.

I can't believe my 'baby' is nearly 18 months old - hard to believe how time flies!

4 girls... wow!!! i secretly hope for boys lol!! girls are way too much trouble!either way ben's already talking about buying "it" a go-kart!

18 months old hey... that seems like a life time away for us at the moment... but im sure time will fly

i hope for girl, im from a family full of boys lol

na not quite 17 weeks Nene, were at 15, we are having the 4D scan to determine the sex, just to make it that little more

exciting!!

congrats again, and congrats to Benny!! PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT!!!!! lol

ps, i still have Bens jacket...

Yeah for sure..

its pretty expensive, but well worth it!

otherwise, we would have to wait till 27ish weeks for the free 4D at modbury, and even then

we only get 1 photo..

with Fetal Fotos, we get pics and DVD to show off :D

ill pm a link to the site for later refferrence :D

just a quick heads up:

Driving home from Barker to Adelaide went through 3 cameras in the hills. I was doing well under the limit :D

2 on the road between littlehampton and balhanah and 1 on the lofty turnoff on greenhill road

Congrats Ben & Nene :D

Just got a phone call telling me i can pick up my car from the brother in laws paint shop, bonnet and boot done and all free of charge :D just got to put a couple of stickers on my car.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...