Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i'd love to see a race with the gtr's and the v8's, still reckon the gtr's will give them a nice can of whoop ass tho :rolleyes: hehe

this is my favourite video of bathurst :P enjoy!!

Edited by vinnie34gtt

just out of interst i have seen it writen in MOTOR magazine or some street car mag, what 1/4 mile does a v8 supercar do? I think when i read it they had the specs for a VX.

Also what kind of power would the 91 bathurst gtr have been putting out ?

My comments on page 2 were in reference to plucking say the Winfield GTR out of retirement in its original 1990-1991 form and placing it on the grid of the 2007 Bathurst 1000 still with the same brakes, tyres, fuel etc as what it was using back then.... not putting a 2007 spec Brembo brake package on it along with R34 N1 turbo's (they didn't exist in 1991) and all the other gadgets that are available today.

It's already been mentioned that the laptimes of the GTR back then are about 5-6sec slower than what was done this year at Bathurst so unless it was raining the 2007 V8SC would smack the living hell out of a 1991 prep'd GTR (if their were no safety cars the GTR would be down by atleast 5 laps).

Hell even Jack Perkins would beat Jim Richards in the Winfield GTR.

Edited by benm
i'd love to see a race with the gtr's and the v8's, still reckon the gtr's will give them a nice can of whoop ass tho :thumbsup: hehe

this is my favourite video of bathurst :) enjoy!!

unreal thats for sure.i didnt realise that they did it so easy..i was 5 when they where racing...

There is no way a '92 GTR would touch a V8 Supercar around Bathurst. Especially seeing as there was no Chase down Conrod straight during Group A days.

If these cars were doing 5 seconds slower without the Chase then imagine how much slower they would be with it!

And whoever said 14 seconds slower around Sandown isn't much should go back to playing Gran Turismo.

I heard a while back that He's contractually forbidden to ever be seen in a Skyline on a race track again

Does Skaifey still own HRT? If so, contract or not, it still wouldn't be in his best interest to be seen in a racing Nissan...especially the one associated with decimating the type of car the team he owns still competes in.

Does Skaifey still own HRT? If so, contract or not, it still wouldn't be in his best interest to be seen in a racing Nissan...especially the one associated with decimating the type of car the team he owns still competes in.

I think he owns a bit of it. He did a dodgey deal with Tom Walkinshaw.

well to be honest the times the v8 supercars run now are dissapointing compared to years gone by.15 or more years later and they are only 5 secs a lap faster.Tyre improvements and track resurfacing over the years would have helped.Try taking all those ridiculous wings off the supercar and I believe it would be considerably slower around the mountain than the GTR.They are currently hitting 297kmh down conrod. Well dick Johnson was pulling those speeds way back in 1990.And it didnt corner as quick as supercars..So it would leave forest elbow at a slower speed than current cars but manage to reel them in by the chase..

There is only 1 king of touring cars

Long live King GTR

well to be honest the times the v8 supercars run now are dissapointing compared to years gone by.15 or more years later and they are only 5 secs a lap faster.Tyre improvements and track resurfacing over the years would have helped.Try taking all those ridiculous wings off the supercar and I believe it would be considerably slower around the mountain than the GTR.They are currently hitting 297kmh down conrod. Well dick Johnson was pulling those speeds way back in 1990.And it didnt corner as quick as supercars..So it would leave forest elbow at a slower speed than current cars but manage to reel them in by the chase..

There is only 1 king of touring cars

Long live King GTR

well said indeed

There is no way a '92 GTR would touch a V8 Supercar around Bathurst. Especially seeing as there was no Chase down Conrod straight during Group A days.

If these cars were doing 5 seconds slower without the Chase then imagine how much slower they would be with it!

And whoever said 14 seconds slower around Sandown isn't much should go back to playing Gran Turismo.

actually you are incorrect, the chase was in place when the GTRs raced. The chase went into conrod straight after 1986 when privateer mike bergman had a massive spin caused his VK Group A lifting off the track over all the bumps on conrod

Exactly they are race cars with shells on them. Can't really compare. If other cars were allowed in, they would have to be same speed as the v8's it would get boring if 1 car was faster than the others all the time.

Production car racing is what you guys want - see Duncan in his GTR :)

Duncans one is broken more often than mine :P

the winfeild GTR would have lung cancer by now anyway :(

:happy:

Yeah for sure the GTR would get smashed, but spend the same budget on both a V8 and a GTR then go racing - THAT would be fun to watch

as for the quarter mile comparison,i was at calder park when they had a v8 supercar vs auscar vs r32 gtr down the quarter. and although i was a v8 fan back then therefore my memory is only vivid the gtr puller 10.8 and the v8 group a pulled 11.8 obviously they were all wearing racing slick tyres whith very little side wall give and the cars were all set up fot circuit not quarter mile. so probably a little unfair to compare. this was in the very early nineties ,might of been the old easter nats before sandown correct me if im wrong.

you are all forgetting 1 thing. at times the gtr was getting beaten by a 4 cylinder ford sierra, that didn't have 4wd. there were only a few v8 fords when the gtr was racing and they were old models as ford made no v8 when the gtr was racing.

and you can't compare the times of some street cars to a v8 supercar. people with street cars can do whatever mods they want. the v8 supercars are limited to what they can do. they have to limit the revs to 7500rpm, they have weight restrictions, suspension restrictions, ecu restrictions, tyre restrictions, diff ratio restrictions, etc. if someone went all out and didn't have to abide by any of them i'm sure they could go a hell of a lot faster. hell, i'm sure f1 cars could go faster if they didn't have as many regulations either.

and the formula holdens are even faster than the v8 supercars. at eastern creek the formula hold lap record is nearly 10 seconds faster than a v8 supercar, and a porsche carrera cup car record is less than 3 seconds slower than the v8, and at bathurst they were lapping as fast as a lot of the v8's even though they were about 20km/h slower down the straight.

you can't compare 2 different catagory race cars evenly because they have a lot of limiting factors. they have so many rules and regulations they have to follow that there is no way that they can be evenly compared.

but i remember a few years back in the GTP races at bathurst there was a few gtr's and they were getting beaten by a lot of other cars (and not just ones in higher classes)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...