Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thats what I was thinking the GTRS but there are more things to consider with the Stagea as being AWD there is no issue with traction so something like a HKS 3037 may be an option or a large garrett GT3040 etc, but I'm thinking GTRS as with the added weight the larger turbos may be even laggier than they would be on a skyline.

I will be modifying the stagea... ther only decisions im going to have to make is which turbo and ecu.. Im thinking PFC.. but Im not sure if ill go HKS GTRS or something like a GT30?? What do you guys think?? are the GT30's really laggy? I mean in the Stagea do you really notice the extra lag because they are so heavy?

just put a jun stroker kit with a T04Z in it, and do limiter launches.. no lag, hey brad? :w00t:

I will be modifying the stagea... ther only decisions im going to have to make is which turbo and ecu.. Im thinking PFC.. but Im not sure if ill go HKS GTRS or something like a GT30?? What do you guys think?? are the GT30's really laggy? I mean in the Stagea do you really notice the extra lag because they are so heavy?

I have a GT30 in my stagea, along with other mods (see my sig). Last tune was 160awkw at just 9psi. I've since changed the boost controller over to a turbotech (recommended by many on these forums, including me) and noticed much improved response and it holds boost better - probably running somewhere around 9-10psi still.

The GT30 is laggy compared to stock. It'll boost up about 500-800rpm later in the revs than when it was stock.

It depends on how you define lag too. For overall speedy response any time any situation you cant beat the stock turbo.

However if I plant my foot at any intersection, even without revving it beforehand, it will be happily revving over 4000rpm by the time I reach the other side of the intersection. I had my boost controller set to 12psi previously and it would hit this figure between 3600 and 4000rpm. I think when it was stock it would hit 6psi by 3000rpm or maybe a bit less, so when you put it all in perspective its not too bad.

On the plus side, the GT30 goes a LOT harder than the stock turbo and pulls all the way to the redline.

My car is auto so with a manual and pfc or at least some kind of ignition timing control you could reduce the lag even further.

And like webng said, the fact that it wont be building much boost (if any) below 2400rpm means you will save on fuel. It certainly wont be enough to pay off the turbo but it will make you feel better every time you visit the servo :P

I do find myself wanting less lag at times but on the whole the gt30 was a good choice. I'd maybe try a GCG high-flow if I was to do it again. hope this helps.

we have a GT-RS on our car and it is a nice bit of kit. slightly more power everywhere than a GCG hi-flow (but it is slightly more expensive). if money is no object the HKS 2835ProS would be pretty nice with a tiny response penalty but higher flow available on both sides of the turbo (ie more efficient).

i wouldn't want anything much larger on a street stagea due to the extra weight you need to lug around.

a GT30 specced correctly (or the more exxy but similar HKS 3037 ProS) with 260 deg tomei poncams to bring the boost threshold down would be ok but there is a little bit more work and time fitting a GT30.

think carefully, as it is an expensive exercise buying one that doesn't suit what you want, however, don't try and do it on the cheap.

...and don't get suckered into bigger is better cos it just aint so.

Yeah im thinking GTRS at the moment. I had an R33 in the past with a HKS 2535 running 244rwkw and it was amazing how responsive and punchy the car was... there was stuff all lag and it just pulled!!!

If it were another skyline then i would go GTRS, the only reason i am thinking about the larger turbo is because I dont know if i am going to be happy with the 250 - 260 rwkw the GTRS will produce in a heavier car.. I'm happy to spend the right money on the right setup but i just dont want to spend the money and take the GTRS to its capacity then realise I want more...

Does anyone have any 1/4 mile times with different turbos and dyno graphs?? terminal speeds etc???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...