Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thats what I was thinking the GTRS but there are more things to consider with the Stagea as being AWD there is no issue with traction so something like a HKS 3037 may be an option or a large garrett GT3040 etc, but I'm thinking GTRS as with the added weight the larger turbos may be even laggier than they would be on a skyline.

I will be modifying the stagea... ther only decisions im going to have to make is which turbo and ecu.. Im thinking PFC.. but Im not sure if ill go HKS GTRS or something like a GT30?? What do you guys think?? are the GT30's really laggy? I mean in the Stagea do you really notice the extra lag because they are so heavy?

just put a jun stroker kit with a T04Z in it, and do limiter launches.. no lag, hey brad? :w00t:

I will be modifying the stagea... ther only decisions im going to have to make is which turbo and ecu.. Im thinking PFC.. but Im not sure if ill go HKS GTRS or something like a GT30?? What do you guys think?? are the GT30's really laggy? I mean in the Stagea do you really notice the extra lag because they are so heavy?

I have a GT30 in my stagea, along with other mods (see my sig). Last tune was 160awkw at just 9psi. I've since changed the boost controller over to a turbotech (recommended by many on these forums, including me) and noticed much improved response and it holds boost better - probably running somewhere around 9-10psi still.

The GT30 is laggy compared to stock. It'll boost up about 500-800rpm later in the revs than when it was stock.

It depends on how you define lag too. For overall speedy response any time any situation you cant beat the stock turbo.

However if I plant my foot at any intersection, even without revving it beforehand, it will be happily revving over 4000rpm by the time I reach the other side of the intersection. I had my boost controller set to 12psi previously and it would hit this figure between 3600 and 4000rpm. I think when it was stock it would hit 6psi by 3000rpm or maybe a bit less, so when you put it all in perspective its not too bad.

On the plus side, the GT30 goes a LOT harder than the stock turbo and pulls all the way to the redline.

My car is auto so with a manual and pfc or at least some kind of ignition timing control you could reduce the lag even further.

And like webng said, the fact that it wont be building much boost (if any) below 2400rpm means you will save on fuel. It certainly wont be enough to pay off the turbo but it will make you feel better every time you visit the servo :P

I do find myself wanting less lag at times but on the whole the gt30 was a good choice. I'd maybe try a GCG high-flow if I was to do it again. hope this helps.

we have a GT-RS on our car and it is a nice bit of kit. slightly more power everywhere than a GCG hi-flow (but it is slightly more expensive). if money is no object the HKS 2835ProS would be pretty nice with a tiny response penalty but higher flow available on both sides of the turbo (ie more efficient).

i wouldn't want anything much larger on a street stagea due to the extra weight you need to lug around.

a GT30 specced correctly (or the more exxy but similar HKS 3037 ProS) with 260 deg tomei poncams to bring the boost threshold down would be ok but there is a little bit more work and time fitting a GT30.

think carefully, as it is an expensive exercise buying one that doesn't suit what you want, however, don't try and do it on the cheap.

...and don't get suckered into bigger is better cos it just aint so.

Yeah im thinking GTRS at the moment. I had an R33 in the past with a HKS 2535 running 244rwkw and it was amazing how responsive and punchy the car was... there was stuff all lag and it just pulled!!!

If it were another skyline then i would go GTRS, the only reason i am thinking about the larger turbo is because I dont know if i am going to be happy with the 250 - 260 rwkw the GTRS will produce in a heavier car.. I'm happy to spend the right money on the right setup but i just dont want to spend the money and take the GTRS to its capacity then realise I want more...

Does anyone have any 1/4 mile times with different turbos and dyno graphs?? terminal speeds etc???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...