Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey fellas,

As the title suggests... this is probably one of the best looking R33 GT-R's I've seen around... I'm not saying all out fancy stuff, just nice and tough... what do you think?

Also, what is that wing he's got on - looks so tough and nice...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/189160-best-looking-r33-gt-r-ive-seen/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, there's this tough look to it, but I think I've seen better.

What was with the driving hahaha

Yeah, it's fairly standard... but hot... hot simple... that's tough...

What wing was it... tough as....

wtf? m3 fenders, a big f**k off clothes line for a wing and more body rocking than a maternity ward... how is that good looking?

and yeah that was pretty shithouse driving... don't think it even qualifies as drifting.

Not. Even. Close

The best 33 GT-R I've ever seen was a silver series 3 featured in one of the last issues of SPEED before it dissapeared

It had the standard bodykit with some carbon fibre additions, and a set of Work Emotion CR Kai rims in silver, with a spot on offset.

Yum.

Not. Even. Close

The best 33 GT-R I've ever seen was a silver series 3 featured in one of the last issues of SPEED before it dissapeared

It had the standard bodykit with some carbon fibre additions, and a set of Work Emotion CR Kai rims in silver, with a spot on offset.

Yum.

Pics please? :)

Jacks R33 GTR. Looks better in real life, but here:

pict0917.jpg

No doubt very clean and tough looking. However, looks like every other GT-R's out there... wouldn't call it a head turn imo.

But very nice, owner should be proud.

No doubt very clean and tough looking. However, looks like every other GT-R's out there... wouldn't call it a head turn imo.

But very nice, owner should be proud.

Yep to the untrained eye it does look like a clean R33 GTR.... few small things sets it off... no crap fibreglass kits that don't fit up properly on this car. No rice. And it goes faster than it looks :domokun:

Yep to the untrained eye it does look like a clean R33 GTR.... few small things sets it off... no crap fibreglass kits that don't fit up properly on this car. No rice. And it goes faster than it looks :domokun:

Agreed and respect to that, champ. But the topic was a bout best looking GT-R.... can't say this is the best looking GT-R though with full respects to it's credentials.

That silver GTR looks better than the one in the clip in my opinion. GTR's look their best just with a set of good offset wheels.

Yeah, that's a fair comment.

You guys notice with sports cars nowadays, everything looks crazy as it is stock... pumped guards, big rims that cover archers, nice lights, tough looking stock wing etc... that's why most new cars, the Skyline GT-R included, doesn't really need much done to them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...