Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Steering racks on the early VL Walkinshaw Commodores. They got rubbed out of the results for that.

Although if you were big at JRA I would be interested to hear your comment on the inflatable fuel bladder story that appeared in the current edition of motorsport news (Not the online one, the one at the news stand).

Also were the Group A 3.5 L Rovers actually any good?

Oh and how the 87 VL that Walkinshaw built compared to Larry's example.

And, and, and.....

I worked at JRA, so I don't know anything about Walkinshaw's other cars, so let's stick to that. If you check the Bathurst results you will find that both cars ran shorter distances between pit stops on their tanks than the competion. Which if they were running oversized tanks would not have been the case. If you have the 1985 video, then please check the length of the pit stops, you will find that the fuel refilling is very similar timing to the other cars. Which would not be the case if the tanks were of larger capacity, hence taking longer to fill. The cars did have a 6/7 litre reserve, a warning light came on on the dash when they fuel level got that low, the driver them switched to the reserve, I can't remember what the switching method was, if I ever knew it. I never saw any more than the legal amount of fuel put in the cars from Wednesday to Sunday. The refueling rig was calibrated and they used scales to measure the fuel put in at every pit stop, my maths is good enough to do the sums on the SG of the fuel used.

The Rovers were good cars, nicely prepared, very well balanced, with great handling and brakes. They just lacked capacity, torque really, which at Bathurst is primary. We did a press day at Oran Park and Percy whipped in a few laps at close to lap record pace. The long climb up the mountain really hurt them, but on a handling circuit they were rapid.

Cheers

Gary

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I worked at JRA, so I don't know anything about Walkinshaw's other cars, so let's stick to that. If you check the Bathurst results you will find that both cars ran shorter distances between pit stops on their tanks than the competion. Which if they were running oversized tanks would not have been the case. If you have the 1985 video, then please check the length of the pit stops, you will find that the fuel refilling is very similar timing to the other cars. Which would not be the case if the tanks were of larger capacity, hence taking longer to fill. The cars did have a 6/7 litre reserve, a warning light came on on the dash when they fuel level got that low, the driver them switched to the reserve, I can't remember what the switching method was, if I ever knew it. I never saw any more than the legal amount of fuel put in the cars from Wednesday to Sunday. The refueling rig was calibrated and they used scales to measure the fuel put in at every pit stop, my maths is good enough to do the sums on the SG of the fuel used.

The Rovers were good cars, nicely prepared, very well balanced, with great handling and brakes. They just lacked capacity, torque really, which at Bathurst is primary. We did a press day at Oran Park and Percy whipped in a few laps at close to lap record pace. The long climb up the mountain really hurt them, but on a handling circuit they were rapid.

Cheers

Gary

What ever happened to the pink rover?

Edited by Jetwreck
I worked at JRA, so I don't know anything about Walkinshaw's other cars, so let's stick to that. If you check the Bathurst results you will find that both cars ran shorter distances between pit stops on their tanks than the competion. Which if they were running oversized tanks would not have been the case. If you have the 1985 video, then please check the length of the pit stops, you will find that the fuel refilling is very similar timing to the other cars. Which would not be the case if the tanks were of larger capacity, hence taking longer to fill. The cars did have a 6/7 litre reserve, a warning light came on on the dash when they fuel level got that low, the driver them switched to the reserve, I can't remember what the switching method was, if I ever knew it. I never saw any more than the legal amount of fuel put in the cars from Wednesday to Sunday. The refueling rig was calibrated and they used scales to measure the fuel put in at every pit stop, my maths is good enough to do the sums on the SG of the fuel used.

The Rovers were good cars, nicely prepared, very well balanced, with great handling and brakes. They just lacked capacity, torque really, which at Bathurst is primary. We did a press day at Oran Park and Percy whipped in a few laps at close to lap record pace. The long climb up the mountain really hurt them, but on a handling circuit they were rapid.

Cheers

Gary

I'll have a look at the video. From memory most teams were still hoiking fuel churns at that stage?

Oh and what really claimed the lead car. Never believed the horseshit about it ingesting headlight glass...

What the Slako/Leeds(?) hot pink number????

Damn...I did an edit...you got to it before I hit update. I think thats it....pretty sure it was white or red before that...Alf Barbagallo.

post-37023-1201757159.jpg

Edited by Jetwreck
I'll have a look at the video. From memory most teams were still hoiking fuel churns at that stage?

From memory 1984 (Rovers) was churns and 1985 (Jags) was an overhead rig, no maybe we didn't use overhead rigs until the BMW's. Too many Bathursts ago, 1,000's and 12 Hour races to remember, maybe time I got the video out again myself. When they were used, the churns were filled from 44's, which were on scales to record their usage. My pit job was crunching numbers, TWR had their own technicians, no Aussies got to touch the cars much at all.

Oh and what really claimed the lead car. Never believed the horseshit about it ingesting headlight glass...

The #1car was Percy and Walkinshaw, finished 3rd

The #3 Car was Goss and Hahne, finished 1st

The #2 car was Soper and Allem, it swallowed the glass.

The foam air filters were directly behind the headlights, one on each side, so it is possible that the broken headlight (reflector) punctured the filter and got sucked in. There were pieces of glass and reflector that fell on the pit garage flooor under the car when it came back. The car went back to the UK untouched, I never saw it with the bonnet open, so I don't know the real story if it was any different. We got a couple of drivers drunk during the celebrations, as you do, but we couldn't get anything contrary out of them. I have seen Gossy a number times over the years and he sticks to the corporate line, maybe that's all he knows as well.

Cheers

Gary

We got a couple of drivers drunk during the celebrations, as you do, but we couldn't get anything contrary out of them. I have seen Gossy a number times over the years and he sticks to the corporate line, maybe that's all he knows as well.

You had to get Gossy pissed to get him to talk? :P How did you ever get him to shut up?

He's alright. Deserved his Bathurst wins no end.

Awww, all this talk of Rover SD1's is making me all nostalgic!

My old man had a special order black 5 speed back in '84/85 that he had Asquith & Johnston stroke and cam. Me being a lil' 9 year old thought dad's car was just the best thing ever, and looking back, it was a good car, probably less issues with that car than any either he or I have ever owned!

Few years back I seriously toyed with building a quick one, but realised that on my budget it meant turfing most of the Rover stuff and fitting Holden gear, so I dropped the plan, built a 32 gtr instead. :P

End sobby-eyed rant gents, my apologies.

Thanks mate!!!! >_<

Great pics on this thread, great discussion.

I also picked up the new mag with the GIO GT-R on the cover. It's great seeing these cars back out on the track to enjoy all over again. I enjoyed the article too (error on engine capacity notwithstanding). However, it seems (quite understandably but unfortunately) that Jim Richards' podium outburst is the one point journalists seem to fixate on. Not the fact that that the race was run in possibly the most atrocious conditions to hit the Mountain on race day; that the world lost a champion in Denny Hulme; that it was essentially the last true Group A Bathurst.... All of these are landmark, but the overriding story seems to be Jim's deserved reply to a bunch of knuckle dragging oxygen thieves. It's a shame the race isn't remembered for more than that.....

Awww, all this talk of Rover SD1's is making me all nostalgic!

My old man had a special order black 5 speed back in '84/85 that he had Asquith & Johnston stroke and cam. Me being a lil' 9 year old thought dad's car was just the best thing ever, and looking back, it was a good car, probably less issues with that car than any either he or I have ever owned!

Few years back I seriously toyed with building a quick one, but realised that on my budget it meant turfing most of the Rover stuff and fitting Holden gear, so I dropped the plan, built a 32 gtr instead. :D

End sobby-eyed rant gents, my apologies.

You would enjoy this one then. It was a red manual with 16 x 8 Simmons gold 3 piece wheels and a 5 litre with the twin throttle bodies off the Group A Vittesse. The 5 litre was the all alloy P76 block, with a forged crank, rods and pistons from the Formula 5000 engine run that was built for the Ansett Elfin (later Anset Charger). It made ~375 hp at the wheels on the Town & Country dyno at Hornsby. I drove it from Warwick to Ipswich and it hardly got below 200 kph all the way. Nice car that one, I didn't like giving it up. :D

Cheers

Gary

lol...I totally agree with all of your statement accept one. I don't have any problem with any Groups A....I do however have major issue's with the V8 Supercars though.....yawn...boring!!

Hey tell me one thing if you know on the B & H Sierra's. In 87 & 88 they were right hand drive. Then in 89 & 90 they were left hand drive. Does this mean that the 87 & 88 cars were built locally and the 89 & 90 car's were from the German Group A series?

OK I dug out an old Bathurst year book & the following were the circumstances:

1. In 1987 There were no B & H Sierras- Frank Gardner ran the JPS M3's that year. The following year (1988) Brock ran the BMW's after his bust up with Holden.

2. They took two Sierras to Bathurst in 1988. Only one ran in the race - winning it as it happens. The left hand drive car sat in the garage and wasn't used in the race. The right hand drive car was the race car. It was the same one that ran the ATCC in white for Longhurst.

3. The two 88 cars were not German. The annual desribes the race winner as "A Don Smith shell fitted out with a kit of components from Andy Rouse" The car was built in Sydney before being shipped North. It was rebuilt before that years Sandown 500.

4. Some bloke called Campbell Little did the engines.

5. Frank Gardner's name was mud in Europe at Ford because his name went on the joint protest that rubbed out the Texaco cars in 1987. So Tomas Mezera was used as an intermediary to buy alot of the parts they needed.

6. I wouldn't expect that latter cars were anything other than locally built.

Someone was asking about TV cameras... These are the Grice/Percy ETCC/BTCC R31, but theres some nice clear frontal pics of the camera setup which was in use over there - possibly similar to here.

WinPercy_1988_Donny_GTS-R_2.jpg

WinPercy_1988_Donny_GTS-R.jpg

Edited by floody
Someone was asking about TV cameras... These are the Grice/Percy ETCC/BTCC R31, but theres some nice clear frontal pics of the camera setup which was in use over there - possibly similar to here.

WinPercy_1988_Donny_GTS-R_2.jpg

WinPercy_1988_Donny_GTS-R.jpg

That was me. Thanks so much for the pictures. I thought the Aussie racecams may have bene larger cameras, but in the absence of any evidence to that, this is fantastic. Thanks!!!!

Also, that was a Nismo Japan car so the cage woudl most likely have been different to the GMS cars? Still good find.

Oh absolutely, most likely different; but possibly there wouldn't have been a massive variance in camera tech then, plus perhaps as now there was an FIA spec for the housing etc...So its probably a reasonable illustrative example.

the R32 must have been a revelation when it was released in 1989.

it pisses me off when people compare the earlier GTR's to more modern performance cars without realising how revolutionary they must have been at the time of their release.

The GT-R completely wiped the floor with it's competitors when released, and for less money too- i.e 964 model Porsche 911, Ferrari 348, Lotus Esprit.

History repeats.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...