Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

im planning to get the r32.4 front conversion put on my 32 GTR, but i was wondering, is anything about it illegal? The front conversion comes with :

- fibreglass front bar,

- fibreglass conversion fenders,

- genuine R34 xenon headlights

- R34 genuine amber indicators

- carbon fibre vented bonnet (vents will be blocked as they face the windscreen :O )

Its all gonna be painted black, except the CF hood.. Any heads up would be appreciated :O

post-39434-1192967336_thumb.jpg

post-39434-1192967288_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190159-r324-front-only-conversion/
Share on other sites

any glass panels are illegal.... so are cat backs come jan2008 (new EPA/adr compliance rules)..... who cares.

lol.. i care coz i dont wanna get a defect and have to take it off after installing it and selling my old front :P

i guess there are alot of cars around with fibreglass bodykits.. cops dont force em to take their kits off..

Trent how can they change the epa rules for older cars thou?? i though all the emmissions laws are for current model cars and not back dated. Also what would that do for the non-gen stuff that are copies of the gen stuff wouldnt that still be classed as a cat back?

technically fibreglass body panels are illegal unless they show similar crumple and crash absorption properties to the original metal... but you'll only have to deal with that if you are getting it engineered.

R34 xenon headlights are non auto levelling, so are illegal.

CF bonnet is just a fibreglass bonnet with a layer of CF on top to make you look cool, so other than running the risk of getting the wrong attention, its the same as having a fibreglass bonnet. There is a transition year (which I can't remember) after which its illegal to have fibreglass (or fake CF) bonnets but R32's should be before that date so you should be OK. Have fun trying to explain to the copper that pulls you over that your "CF look" bonnet's not real 100% CF, and therefore semi legal though.

technically fibreglass body panels are illegal unless they show similar crumple and crash absorption properties to the original metal... but you'll only have to deal with that if you are getting it engineered.

R34 xenon headlights are non auto levelling, so are illegal.

CF bonnet is just a fibreglass bonnet with a layer of CF on top to make you look cool, so other than running the risk of getting the wrong attention, its the same as having a fibreglass bonnet. There is a transition year (which I can't remember) after which its illegal to have fibreglass (or fake CF) bonnets but R32's should be before that date so you should be OK. Have fun trying to explain to the copper that pulls you over that your "CF look" bonnet's not real 100% CF, and therefore semi legal though.

ok cool, so the body panels wont be too big a deal..

the headlights should be ok, since so many ricers have it.. Is it possible to change the headlights to non xenon without selling my pair and buying another?

as for the "CF" bonnet, it should be ok, as long as the officer is understanding :P lol

thanks for all the help guys :rolleyes:

  • 2 weeks later...

the headlights should be ok, since so many ricers have it..

they came standard with xenons so quite a few people have them if they didnt get complied properly not just ricers

and im pretty sure (not 100%) that fiberglass bonnets and guards are illegal, there is one place in Queensland that has just gotten their fibreglass bonnets approved in their state (artical in the last hot 4's) as said before, to o with crumple zones

just keep your H1 bulbs and trim the housing down to suit the D2S housing of the HID lights :ninja:

put the H1 bulbs into the HID housing, it'll look ok still, they do it all the time when compliancing, make sure you keep the ballasts and HID bulbs with you though, or the compliancer has every right to destroy them

Get the cert, then put the lights back in at home :D

Not sure about the guards/bonnet though, i mean your whole car will be fibreglass at the front, there must be a way round it though, maybe borrow an R34 bonnet in steel for the compliancing? I'm sure someone won't mind driving with your CF bonnet for a weekend :P while you use theirs :)

certainly would look hot! i want to do this in the near future as well but its pointless getting the full kit as i have a 4dr :)

one thing i dont like about this kit is the front bar!!!!!! god damn its ugly.

perhaps a BN kit or something would look nice.

Edited by whyte

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...