Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all,

i was just wondering about some RB engines i have seen around.

some of them have the 6 coilpacks replaced with high tension leads running to the spark plugs instead.

has the ignition module and the coil been replaced with aftermarket units? or how is this done?

any advantages other than easier to change the plugs?

can someone please advise.

ron

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19017-new-ignition-setup/
Share on other sites

believe this is done to allow bigger coilpacks, therefore bigger spark. Very handy if you are running CDI.

Have only seen it done on a track GTR, it was using 6 ford 6 cylinder coil packs, ie, each coilpack was used by ford on the falcons to run six sparkplugs, was hooked up to its own plug.

I have been told that just by removing the cover on the stock coilpacks will aid cooling as well (of the coilpacks)

ive seen this done using the factory coils bolted to the firewall runnin ht leads to the spark plugs ona factory computer

but i dont think u can use the bosh gt40 coils with the factory igtion system coz the gt40 coils have 2 wires + and - were as the factory system has 3 wires + and - and a signal wire tryin to find out what the signal wire does at the moment

hi,

what steve said earlier sounds right by using some Ford coils to replace. I had a look in an MSD catalog and found some modules that may work for 6 cly of course, but dunno about the cost.

i took my cover off a while a go but cannot tell any different.

but it will sure cool the packs down.

the car that i saw was stock by the way, man!!! should ve had a better look!!!!

ron

Hi guys, if you are loking at more than 750 bhp then upgrading the standard coils may be worthwhile, under that it's a waste of money.

If you are looking at more than 750 bhp, then 6 individual coil packs suitable for CDI would be the best choice. No hi tension leads as they add another area for problems. On the Motec CDI equiped race cars we use Mercury outboard coils at the plugs mounted on a fabricated rail.

Hope that helps

When you look at the age of coil packs on a R32 in particular, we need to start thinking about alternative and newer methods to ensure reliability of the vehicle if we decide to own it for a few more years.

Another benefit is the ease of changing plugs. I hate that job and im sure there are other out there that do to.

I have thought about getting my hands on a crow cams amplifier pack and wiring it into the loom so it recieves the signal from the ignition pack then power is transferred to the plugs through hi tension leads?

Not really interested in adding hi tension leads but would be keen to find a cheaper replacement for when the coils die.

I guess you could resite the coil rails to mount on the rocker cover and run very short plug leads

These cars you see running aftermarket coils are using aftermarket ECU's.

Around 1 year ago, I saw an RB with I think it was a VP coil pack running high tension leads.

A few phone calls later and I was told that it is impossible with the stock ECU.

The standard coils are good enough for around 700hp so replacing them is a waste of time and money, heat soak is what kills them a CDI is a good fix for this problem as the dwell is reduced resulting in a decrease in coil heating. The standard coils have 3 wires running to them 1 pos 1 neg and the other is a ground connection to the cyl head.

cheers

Hi guys, the standard RB ignition coils are not really designed for use with a CDI. A CDI works by repeated rapid discharges from a capacitor during a single plug firing. The standard RB coils are designed for one single discharge per firing.

So if you intend to drive the coils with a CDI, then you really should use coils designed for multiple discharges. Otherwise you are not going to see the best effect from using a CDI. The cheapest/best CDI capable coils we have found are the Mercury outboard coils I previously mentioned.

Realistically I have found a very, very low percentage of RB standard coil failures. Plus good second hand ones have proven very easy and cheap to locate. High tension lead failure is a far more likely occurrence, so I avoid them. As Mort posted, over 700 bhp and I would think seriously about CDI with on plug coils, under that and its a waste of time and money.

Hope that clarifies

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...