Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well if you read the wheels mag they have the first excluseve on the new R35 GTR.

and i dont wont it.

a 60 deg v6 with 345kw

non etesa

non manual

looks like a commondore (imo)

non straight six

and is useing thermos from what i could gather from the eng bay pic.

i didn't read throught the full artical but apparatnly does 7.35sec min at nurburg (from memory)

any way gone is a true GTR

the new one is built for the street not the track (as drive (herald sun) reports)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/
Share on other sites

well if you read the wheels mag they have the first excluseve on the new R35 GTR.

and i dont wont it.

a 60 deg v6 with 345kw

non etesa

non manual

looks like a commondore (imo)

non straight six

and is useing thermos from what i could gather from the eng bay pic.

i didn't read throught the full artical but apparatnly does 7.35sec min at nurburg (from memory)

any way gone is a true GTR

the new one is built for the street not the track (as drive (herald sun) reports)

gone is the true GTR ??

show me a stock 34 do 0 - 100 in 3.6 secs lol, or even do a 7.38 at the Nurburgring for that matter, This wll never take the place of GTRs gone in my mind, but i wont discount it as a true GTR either, its HOT and flippen powerfull

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437149
Share on other sites

This wll never take the place of GTRs gone in my mind

why?

does it need to be 20 seconds slower around the 'ring, have a weaksauce oil supply system, and be cursed with 5/8ths of f**k-all low rpm torque to be 'the real deal' :spank:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437159
Share on other sites

well it already has a much better lubrication system than the RB-series engines, forged pistons and has titanium conrods/valves standard

the only potential weak links are the block rigidity or (although unlikely) the head gasket design

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437172
Share on other sites

well if you read the wheels mag they have the first excluseve on the new R35 GTR.

and i dont wont it.

a 60 deg v6 with 345kw

non etesa

non manual

looks like a commondore (imo)

non straight six

and is useing thermos from what i could gather from the eng bay pic.

i didn't read throught the full artical but apparatnly does 7.35sec min at nurburg (from memory)

any way gone is a true GTR

the new one is built for the street not the track (as drive (herald sun) reports)

:spank:

It looks more like a 350Z, and the last I looked, that's not a Commodore.

Non manual? DSG is even better than manual -- true super-cars of the 21st century have all gone this way so why shouldn't Nissan?

No "etesa"? It has ATTESA E-TS all wheel drive.

It has 353kw and 588nm torque from a VR38DETT (3.8 litre twin turbo DOHC V6) engine; in my opinion, this will not only be "true" to the GT-R image, but will enhance it. Its going to be roughly half the price of a Porsche for the same performance around a track, to me that sounds exactly like what the next GT-R is and should be all about.

Edited by M34N
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437173
Share on other sites

However much of a ball tearer this is, and however much I want it, i'll still always have a special place in my heart for the 'old skool' Japanese cars even if a lot of them had inherent faults from the factory :spank:

Edited by Yawn
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437180
Share on other sites

actually if you think about it, every single GTR in Nissan's history has been a straight 6... the S20 in the C10 and C110, and the RB26 in the R32, R33 and R34.

I still say that the new GT-R is more Z than Skyline, just whoring on the heritage of the Skyline brand and icons.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437197
Share on other sites

However much of a ball tearer this is, and however much I want it, i'll still always have a special place in my heart for the 'old skool' Japanese cars even if a lot of them had inherent faults from the factory biggrin.gif

same

but the world moves on- not many people here would think all that highly of the V8 type that just have to have a big Holley 850 carb and kettering distributor ignition system on their 351c.i pushrod valve bounce machine

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437200
Share on other sites

actually if you think about it, every single GTR in Nissan's history has been a straight 6... the S20 in the C10 and C110, and the RB26 in the R32, R33 and R34.

I still say that the new GT-R is more Z than Skyline, just whoring on the heritage of the Skyline brand and icons.

now there are only 2 manufacturers in the world making full-production I6 passenger cars: BMW and Ford

everyone else seems to have realized that you get better handling balance without 2 or 3 cylinders hanging forward of the front axle line

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437207
Share on other sites

now there are only 2 manufacturers in the world making full-production I6 passenger cars: BMW and Ford

actually BMW just ditched the I6 for a V8 in the 3 series last month.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437220
Share on other sites

to the thread starter... have you read ANY of the threads in this section?? some of this shit has been confirmed for ages, thanks to people like justin (7tune.com)

and i read the whole article in wheels. 1) wheels=useless, 95% front cover holden, mag 2) they have on their front cover the INCORRECT power figure, nice work :spank: 3) In the contents pages, they call it a friggen Skyline GTR.

wheels=useless

the thing has OFFICIALLY been released, with full specs on the website and the god damn CEO himself giving the power figure, and they still get it wrong

idiots

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3437292
Share on other sites

i agree with the comments about it looking more like a 350Z. It's the front headlights. The skylines, Z's, and now GTR share VERY similar front end styling. That was the thing i hated the most about the 350Z when it first came out, but nissan seem to love that headlight design ;\

i agree with the above comment. it needs a squarer front end ;D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190917-it-is-unleshed/#findComment-3438608
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...