Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Doesnt work like that :P

Even here on 24000/1000 it can take a good few seconds to flash up a page sometimes when people linking silly .GIF's form imageshack or something slow as a snail.

hint hint steve!!!

:)

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i just tried making a new sig but all it's doing is take me to the link that i've added there...so i can't change it... could someone just delete the whole thing for me please?

thnx

you have the width set to 550, why not set the width bigger ie. 700 to fit on the "standard minimum res" of 800x600 (i would argue that this would be 1024x768 these days and that 900 width would be fine) this gives people more room, Hi Bec, to have wide sigs that will not take up any more space on the screen

I think you want to encourage people to have wide sigs as opposed to high ones imo

well I calculated 550 using an 800x600 display, which allowed for the sidebars n errthang to fit nicely. I know 1024 is probably a more realistic width in the household, but we still have to cater for the lowest common denominator. and if you're using anything lower than 800x600 you need to move out of the cave.

550's actually more than what most forums allows as width for signatures... I mean... we are talkin about signatures here... which are supposed to be short n catchy.

Can you please just make the limit a bit longer funky?

+1 :D

I mean... we are talkin about signatures here... which are supposed to be short n catchy.

says he with an animated gif as his sig :P

Its like giveing candy to a child and then taking it back :(

If we never had large sigs to begin with, then it wouldnt be an issue. But we are used to a certain 'way of life' now, you cant take them away. Why - coz i said!!! ;)

LOL - j/k - im just being a pain, im happy with whatever you guys decide is best.

(But a smidge wider would be tops)

people who use 800 x 600 should be inconvenienced anyway :P

btw.. the restrictions dont seem to work on my machine at work using IE6. thought it was just cache, but i can see changes and updates to signatures so yeh..

Yeh okay I get why mine was all chopped off. I'm a little manky that I can't have a mass of crap in my sig anymore. But if that's what you're doing then you shall rue this day... well go on, start rueing!

not much point to all this though if we dont have a kb limit!

i constantly am seeing huge images cramed into avatars and the like which im sure if you were using dial up or on a busy network would be ghey

If you see a large sig (GIF) drop a PM to an Admin.

You'd be surprised how many people do :no:

I get about 5 or so a month on average and i have no problem in helping out as sometimes ive found 2.5mg GIF's that (when im capped), make me a very sad panda.

I cannot believe that anyone still uses a resolution of 800 x 600. I thought that I was doing it tough trying to cope with 1440 x 900 in this day and age.

I have cut my signature down yet again and it is still being cut off - I do think that you have gone just a little bit too far with the restriction.

To everyone saying its harsh...

See the board rules:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/boardrules.html

# Keep signature images to within 600x150 pixels

# Combined Text and Image signatures to be kept within 600x200 pixels

All that's occurring here is enforcement as people just abused it more and more to the point where Admin couldn't police it any longer.

On a weekly basis i would see sigs around the 600x400 mark, i kid you not.

It was becoming more and more common place for users not to care about board rules designed to keep the board performance up.

So basically its like anything in life. The few that abused it totally ruined it for the majority.

A sig that was say 700x220 i would let slide... but 600x400 occurring once a week for me was just unreasonable and as Admin i dont feel my time should be spent sending nice PM's to people about their clear disregard for a basic rule, and one of very few rules we actually have on this board compared to many others

We have the rules to keep the forum fast :P

And since the requirement to move to a US server, this has only added to the need to keep things in trim terrific order.

The board/site in the last week has had lots of time spent on it, and each little thing adds up to one big one - a super fast SAU for 400-500 users at any given time

the restriction that I put in was more to do with visual clutter than it is about speed. just trying to cut down on the mass of crap that follows each post that detracts from the content.

as I said this isn't permanent and i'm open to feedback.

lol i'm running on 1680x1050 and even thinking of going back to a 800x600 gives me convulsions...

by the same arguement of space restriction vs size restriction, if you're not on broadband then you should upgrade... unfortunately this isn't a viable option for everyone, so we need to try n keep the kb sizes down too... unfortunately controlling the size of sigs hotlinked to the forum is near impossible. avatars on the other hand isn't too hard... just have to force everyone to upload their avatars instead of hotlinking it. inconvenient but possible.

sammeh... the restriction is done using an external stylesheet, so the style sheet might still be cached.

try loading this page and the doin a ctrl+shift+refresh:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/st...ages/css_17.css

for those of you guys running firefox with greasemonkey, its easy to intercept and hack this file to remove the sig restriction (dunno why you'd wanna) but it'll only be for that PC.

In any case, I've upped the sig size limit from 550x150 to 600x200 as per the rules (lol I didn't actually read em, thanks Ash)

Still no change, but the cache might not be on my machine might be the work proxy.

The one thing I dont like about the sig restrictions is that it doesnt allow you to allign your signature left centre right etc.. its all left

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess when I say it's a POS I mean.. the solution and the stuff has the capacity for maybe... 1 spot. You know, as a spot cleaner. What I really *want* is the ability to do an entire car, all upholstery, all carpet, mats, all seats, door card inserts, A pillars, roof liners, etc. In one go. I get lured by all the jank that comes out and think "I'd like to be able to clean to that degree"
    • I've got one (not the car one, the domestic spot cleaner one, which is basically the same jobbie) and have driven it hard for hours and hours at a time. Grimy sofas, 6' floor rugs, etc. I'd blame your specific example rather than the whole category. I haven't used mine in the car, because.... you know, it's my car. So there is no-one else's ball sweat in the driver's seat, there's no kid food/drink spills or hand prints inside because they've never had an opportunity to put them there. You know, basic, standard Skyline rules.
    • I normally run with I think a 10mm, and definitely use the second handle you can add to a drill. They hurt when they bins up!   For the crush tube, once all subframe is clear, I'd try some stilsons and see if I can get it to start to twist.
    • Probably because they couldn't, because the use of the variable resistor to create a "signal" in the ECU is managed by the ECU's circuitry. The only way that VDO could do it would be if they made a "smart" sensor that directly created the 0-5V signal itself. And that takes us back to the beginning. Well, in that case, you could do the crude digital (ie, binary, on or off) input that I mentioned before, to at least put a marker on the trace. If you pressed the button only at a series of known integer temperatures, say every 2°C from the start of your range of interest up to whatever you can manage, and you know what temperature the first press was at, then you'd have the voltage marked for all of those temperatures. And you can have more than one shot at it too. You can set the car up to get the oil hot (bypass oil coolers, mask off the air flow to oil coolers, and/or the radiator, to get the whole engine a bit hotter, then give it a bit of curry to get some measurements up near the top of the range.   On the subject of the formula for the data you provided, I did something different to Matt's approach, and got a slightly different linear formula, being Temp = -22.45*V + 118.32. Just a curve fit from Excel using all the points, instead of just throwing it through 2 points. A little more accurate, but not drastically different. Rsquared is only 0.9955 though, which is good but not great. If you could use higher order polynomials in the thingo, then a quadratic fit gives an excellent Rsquared of 0.9994. Temp = 2.1059*V^2 - 34.13*V + 133.27. The funny thing is, though, that I'd probably trust the linear fit more for extrapolation beyond the provided data. The quadratic might get a bit squirrely. Hang on, I'll use the formulae to extend the plots.... It's really big so you can see all the lines. I might have to say that I think I really still prefer the quadratic fit. It looks like the linear fit overstates the temperature in the middle of the input range, and would pretty solidly understate what the likely shape of the real curve would say at both ends.
    • I got a hand held bisssel one and it's a piece of shit. Doesn't work for more than about 5 seconds. So much so that I nearly refuse to believe any wet dry vac actually works or has enough suction to clean the carpet of a car. I'm discouraged as all the good ones are $300+ for an unknown result. I saw MCM did a Ryobi video where they use this thing: https://www.ryobi.com.au/products/stick-vacuum-cleaners/18v-one-hptm-brushless-spot-cleaner-tool-only Anyone have any experience actually using a tool like this when not paid to showcase it?
×
×
  • Create New...